Economy Makes Obama Vulnerable But Romney Cannot Exploit It

Earlier today I suggested that Romney has very little chance to beat Obama. The one thing that could render that analysis incorrect is the economy. It appears manufacturing is slowing down, shrinking in June for the first time in three years. On Friday the unemployment figures will be released, odds are it isn’t going to be terrific. Based on new unemployment claims, which in June averaged 387,000 per week, the unemployment number isn’t going down. New unemployment claims never decreased in June, despite the Department of Labor making such a claim nearly every week. They of course revise the previous week’s figures up and anything less is considered a “decline.”

Thursday’s Obamacare ruling caused stocks to drop dramatically. They rebounded Friday but only because Europe had reached a tentative economic deal. Stocks are back down today as businesses are very concerned over Obamacare. Individuals should be concerned as well, around 75% of the new taxes will be paid by those making less than $120,000 per year. With Obamacare scheduled to take effect in 2014, there is now actual tax and cost uncertainty. No one really knows how Obamacare is going to work. Businesses that don’t provide insurance today will likely see costs increase as they are taxed for failing to provide insurance. Likewise, individuals are also facing a massive tax increase if they don’t buy insurance.

In January 2013 we are facing massive tax increases as the Bush tax cuts expire. This has created tax uncertainty. John Roberts is to thank for piling on the uncertainty by ruling Obamacare a tax. Now businesses and individuals face tax and regulatory uncertainty going into 2014. The result is that stocks are down today. Couple that with manufacturing slowing, a stagnant economy and no real plan for the next four years, there are holes in Obama’s re-election campaign.

But these holes are not being exploited by Romney. A major Romney advisor is claiming the individual mandate isn’t a tax. If it isn’t a tax then the Supreme Court is insane (I’ll second that) but if it isn’t a tax it also undercuts the argument that Obamacare is now the biggest tax increase in history and thus Obama reneged on his promise not to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000. What a foolish thing for a Romney advisor to say, he should be promptly fired. Unfortunately this isn’t the first time Eric Fehrnstrom has said something foolish, thus it’s a safe bet that Romney won’t fire him.

Romney still hasn’t offered a serious economic reform package that is simple and concise. He remains committed to his 56 point plan that he laid out during the GOP primary. This is of course absolutely foolishness. He needs to have a 4 point plan with all of the points easily understood in a sentence. He can lay out his four points in more detail of course but the main four must be concise and easily understood. Obviously they must contrast with Obama’s, which shouldn’t be difficult if Romney plans on halting government expansion and relying more on the private sector. But he hasn’t done this yet, which is maddening.

Obama is vulnerable but Romney is so weak, so afraid to make a bold move that Obama’s weaknesses cannot be exploited. We live in a country that has had 8% unemployment or higher throughout Obama’s term. We have added $5 trillion to the national debt. Obamacare is the largest tax increase in history and more tax increases are on the way when Bush’s tax cuts expire. We face massive economic uncertainty with a President who doesn’t really understand economics. Yet the GOP picked the weakest candidate to go up against Obama. Beating Obama should be a slam dunk. Instead he’s likely to dunk on the Republicans.

Why Mitt Romney Will Lose To Obama

We need to come to grips with the fact that Obama is likely to be re-elected this November. There are any number of reasons for this, not the least of which is that Obama has been able to hold steady despite two months of increasingly bad news. Chief Justice Roberts gave Obama a massive political victory by bowing to outside political pressure in the Obamacare ruling. This victory for Obama suddenly makes him look like a winner. Initially I believed the ruling would help Romney but after thinking about it some I no longer believe this to be the case. Obama has at least a 75% chance of being re-elected, perhaps even more.

Romney now has to argue on  a national stage against Obamacare. He’s going to have a difficult time doing this in light of the fact that he is responsible for Romneycare. Obama will spend the entire fall claiming that he got the idea for Obamacare from Romney. It’s an absolute lie of course but by the time Romney and the GOP expose the lie the public will have moved on an the lie will become the truth. So far Romney’s call for repeal has gone over great with the people who already support him. But his lack of details concerning what he would replace Obamacare with aren’t going to inspire independents to vote for him. Romney needs a plan and he needs it now. Romney should announce a major healthcare speech for the week after Independence Day wherein he lays out what he would replace Obamacare with. So far that doesn’t appear to be forthcoming. He’s relying on the Obamacare ruling to be so unpopular that no one will care what his plan is so long as he repeals Obama’s. This is a fatal error.

Europe doesn’t appear headed for a blowup anytime soon. Merkel caved and the Euro Zone will continue bailouts and assorted nonsense. While the Zone may ultimately collapse, it won’t do so this year. As such stocks climbed substantially on Friday. That can only help Obama, who in the very least won’t face a massive international economic crisis in the next four months. He’ll face poor economic performance here at home and general economic uncertainty. Whether that will hurt him remains to be seen. The problem Romney faces is that he has yet to put forward a detailed economic vision. Independent voters may be willing to give Romney a look but not if he doesn’t provide a detailed plan. Again, simply being against Obama’s vision doesn’t win.

Looking at the electoral college, it’s difficult to see Romney’s path to victory. It’s hard to believe he’ll take Virginia at this point. He isn’t going to take Michigan or Wisconsin despite the GOP’s hopeful attitude about the state’s. Ohio is making an economic recovery, largely because of Gov. John Kasich’s economic reforms. Unfortunately Obama is likely to be given credit and as such it’s becoming increasingly clear that Ohio isn’t going to be won. That leaves Romney with no path to victory. Obviously economic news can change but at this point the polls seem to indicate a big Obama win.

Let’s be honest my fellow Republicans, none of us really expected Romney to win. As with all the other moderates nominated before him, he’s destined to lose. The American people would rather have an authentic liberal than a faux conservative. When will our party ever learn its lesson? Ford, Bush 41 (after we figured out who he really was), Dole, McCain and Romney are all cut from the same cloth. They’re all moderate to liberal and they’ve all lost. We keep getting told that the conservative can’t win when the reality is that the moderate can’t win. The result of nominating Romney will be defeat and four more years of the most destructive President this nation has ever known. I hope the moderate’s in the Party will be happy.

Individual Mandate A “Tax?” Romney Given A Major Issue

The Obamacare decision is in with Bush appointee John Roberts siding with the liberals in ruling it constitutional. The mandate it appears will be declared a “tax” and thus it doesn’t fall under the Commerce Clause. It’s the most absurd of rulings, a complete cop out that ignores what the mandate actually is. Even Obama said it isn’t a tax. In calling it a tax, the Court suggests that individuals can simply “opt out” and refuse to pay it. And what, have 100 Fed agents on our doorstep demanding money? Ridiculous. So much for President Bush appointing conservatives to the bench. These Supreme Court appointments matter and Bush completely dropped the ball with Roberts. It would have been even worse had Alito not replaced the pathetic Harriet Miers.

With all of this in mind, expect Obama to gloat. But also expect the Tea Party to rise up in protest, backing Romney with vengeance. Romney’s campaign has been doing pretty good so far, they’ve not run into any major gaffes recently. Expect Romney to get a slight boost in terms of support as Tea Partiers who may be sitting on the sidelines suddenly join the Romney fray. Obamacare is still opposed by over 50% of the country, so Romney clearly has an issue to play with here. This could be the issue that puts him over the top, Obamacare remains unpopular.

Also expect Romney to raise a significant amount of cash. The Tea Party isn’t the only group that hates Obamacare, businesses and Catholics hate it as well. It’s caused premiums to skyrocket and we all know what Obama is trying to do to the Roman Catholic Church concerning contraception. If 5% of Roman Catholics who generally vote Democrat swing to Romney because they don’t like what Obama is doing that could be enough to win the election for Romney. That issue is back in play now.

Romney has been given a golden opportunity to campaign on the repeal of a job destroying, unpopular 2,000+ page healthcare law. He has the opportunity to corral all of the Tea Party into his camp. The ruling in the very least didn’t expand the Commerce Clause, we can at least rest on that. But this is truly the best ruling for Romney if he wants to win because now he has a major issue besides the economy to run on. He needs to campaign on repeal and offer his own, clear, concise market based alternative. If he does that, he can win this election.

Supreme Court Poised To Destroy Individual Freedom

The Obamacare decision is going to be handed down on Thursday. It appears that Chief Justice Roberts will be delivering the opinion. That means it’s either 5-4 to overturn at least the mandate or 6-3 to uphold the law. The liberal press is in borderline freak out mode over the notion that this law might be ruled unconstitutional, they can’t imagine how it can be. That largely stems from their refusal to take conservative jurisprudence seriously. Another like of articles the past few days, both on the left and right, have focused on how bad this decision will be for Obama. The bigger question is what will this decision mean for the American people?

A ruling that Obamacare is constitutional isn’t out of the question. I’d say it’s 60-40 that it doesn’t happen, but that means there’s at least a 40% chance that this law is ruled constitutional. What does that mean for freedom in American though? If the individual mandate is constitutional, is there any essential aspect of life that the government cannot regulate? Keep in mind, this is the argument the liberals have been making on Obamacare. Healthcare is something everyone will need eventually and therefore the Commerce Clause allows the government to mandate that we buy private health insurance.

If having the government regulate commerce means they can force us to buy essential products like health insurance there is nothing essential they cannot force us to buy. It is essential that we eat, therefore the government could regulate commerce by forcing us to buy healthy food. People laughed when Scalia suggested the government could force us to buy broccoli but why wouldn’t the government be able to do this? We all have to eat and government may decide to save money on healthcare the American people need to eat healthy food. Therefore as part of its Commerce power, the Congress could order us to buy healthy food. It’s not out of the question, in fact the argument for this is identical to the individual mandate argument.

We could come up with any number of other products that are essential in this life and because they require us to buy something and are commerce, the government could order us to buy them if the individual mandate is upheld. Funeral services, water, shelter, clothing etc. You may laugh at these suggestions but if Congress may use its Commerce Clause power to mandate the purchase of health insurance because health insurance is essential to living, then government can mandate the purchase of all these other essential products of life. You have to wonder though at what point does the consent of the governed cease.

The Federalist Papers argued for the Commerce Clause and nowhere did the founders argue that this clause could order the American people to buy private products. It’s one thing to regulate commerce between the several states to ensure that the states aren’t placing special taxes, fees or regulations on products produced out of state. It’s another thing for Congress to regulate commerce by ordering the American people to buy products, no matter how essential they may be. If government can order us to buy health insurance, there is no power over us that they don’t have. The government will cease to be of the people but it will have become a dictatorship.

I hope that the Supreme Court will rule the mandate unconstitutional and thus place limits on the power of the Federal government. It would not surprise me in the least though if they rule it constitutional. Kennedy is weak and I fear Roberts isn’t nearly as conservative as we had originally hoped. A ruling of constitutional will likely rile up Republicans and propel Romney into office. But even if he is able to repeal Obamacare, the damage will already be done. The Supreme Court precedent will be in place and the next Democrat, if not Romney, will likely take full advantage of it. What the American people must ask themselves though is whether this is the freedom that the founders wanted for this nation.

No Outright Winner In Arizona Immigration Case

The Supreme Court punted Obamacare to Thursday but they did issue a decision on the Arizona immigration law case. The Court split the baby, allowing Arizona to ask the immigration status people arrested or stop for questioning who they suspect are here illegally. While upholding that part of the law, the Court did not uphold provisions that required immigrants to carry papers on their person, made criminal seeking employment without proper work permits and allowed cops to arrest illegals for deportable crimes if the crimes didn’t occur in Arizona. Interestingly the one provision the Court upheld was 8-0.

No doubt Obama is going to declare victory in this case even though he didn’t win much. Likewise conservatives didn’t win much either. Obama’s victories are overshadowed by the determination that people arrested or questioned in Arizona can he asked about their immigration status. That was a major portion of his public, political argument against the Arizona law. He didn’t spend his time outraged that Arizona ran roughshod over the Federal government’s employment laws, he was outraged that Arizona was questioning folks suspected of being here illegally. On that major issue, Obama lost. No doubt he’ll hang his hat on his victories but politically they don’t amount to much.

The conservatives didn’t win much either. Yes, Arizona can now ask suspected illegals of their immigration status. But the ruling further diminished the power of the states to enforce Federal law or write their own laws with regard to people who are in the country illegally. States rights apparently mean very little to the Supreme Court these days. You would think that a state would be able to require workers in their state to hold valid permits to work. That those permits come from the Federal government should really have no bearing on whether a state can use them to determine an employee’s ability to work. Under this ruling, would it be legal for a state to use a Federal passport as proper ID? Probably not.

Don’t spend much time reading anything about Obamacare from this case. Yes, Kennedy delivered the majority opinion. The one provision held constitutional was 8-0, two of the unconstitutional provisions were 5-3 with Roberts joining Kennedy and one was 6-2 with Alito joining. The issues in these two cases and in the juvenile parole case (which was 5-4, Kennedy joining the liberals) aren’t the same as Obamacare. These cases didn’t involve the Commerce Clause in any meaningful way. Having said that, don’t be surprised if conservatives begin freaking out over Kennedy’s Arizona opinion, assuming Obamacare is now saved. If you’re inclined to play the freak out game, keep in mind Kennedy voted to uphold Citizens United in a case involving corporate spending limits in Montana.

This sets the stage for Thursday’s Obamacare ruling. My prediction is that the individual mandate will be ruled unconstitutional but the Court will rule the rest of it severable from the mandate and therefore the whole law won’t be thrown out. While personally don’t believe the mandate is severable from the rest of the Obamacare Act, the court will determine as such in an attempt to split the baby. The fallout both legally and politically from such a decision ought to be completely fascinating. This decision, no matter what it is, will mark the first opportunity for both Obama and Romney to stand out and dramatically shift the fall campaign.

Obama Looks Weak, Incompetent At G20 Press Conference

Did any of you catch President Obama’s prime time press conference yesterday at the G20 meeting in Mexico? Yours truly had the misfortune of watching it. It was one of the worst press conferences I’ve ever witnessed. It makes one wonder if this President is really as smart as his sycophants in the media claim. It makes one wonder what his team was thinking when they decided to hold a prime time press conference. One thing is certain though, when Obama doesn’t have his teleprompter and when he doesn’t anticipate the questions he really doesn’t speak very clearly. He isn’t the amazing orator he’s been billed as.

Three of his answers stood out to me. The first concerned the economic situation in Europe. Obama droned on for 4 minutes about Europe and it honestly sounded like he was giving a class presentation in his freshman economics class. It is apparent that Obama doesn’t really understand how the economy works. His cursory understanding was on full display last night as he explained in detail that if there isn’t any money in Paris or Berlin they can’t buy products made in Pittsburgh or Cleveland. All hail Obama’s genius! The scary thing is that he made that comment in such a way that makes one believe he thought it was a terrific point. Instead, he looks like an economic moron. That’s if viewers were even paying attention by the time he made it.

Putin apparently lectured Obama at the G20 meeting, which of course prompted a question about Russia’s involvement in Syria. Obama once again droned on for 4-5 minutes and was all over the place in his answer. His thesis seemed to be that eventually Russia will see the wisdom of Obama’s position and follow it. Because of course Obama is a genius and eventually everyone will recognize it. His answer was ridiculous. Putin isn’t going to accept the Obama position because Obama refuses to throw the weight of the American Presidency around. Obama would have been better off saying diplomacy is taking place and not commenting further. Instead he was all over the place, he looked weak and pathetic. The world was watching, including the Kremlin.

Obama was asked about a Romney advisor who questioned Obama’s economic policy in a German publication. Obama once again pointed out that he’s the President, a sign of weakness if there ever was one. He also suggested that American disagreements end at our shores. That’s interesting considering Obama’s campaign speech in Berlin in 2008. Once again though Obama droned on for several minutes not answering the question and making thinly veiled attacks on Bush and Romney. It was a weak answer that didn’t make any sense. Anytime the President feels the need to throw his weight around by declaring he’s the President, he’s already lost the issue at hand.

What is perhaps most interesting about all of this is that the Obama team thought it would be a good idea to put this press conference on during primetime hours when more people will be watching. The Obama presser was the lead in to the most watched hour of news on the news channels, so more people watched than had it been on at 2 in the afternoon. They clearly thought they could accomplish something politically with the timing and they did. They boosted Romney’s chances. Obama has never given such a poor performance and it couldn’t come at a worse time for him.

Obama looked incompetent and weak last night. He sounds like he has no idea what he’s doing, he sounds like he’s over his head. He doesn’t understand the economy, he doesn’t understand foreign diplomacy. Worst of all, he doesn’t understand the power of the American Presidency and he doesn’t understand how to use it. We have a very weak man in the White House and we have very serious situations facing us at home and abroad. Nothing could be worse for Obama than showcasing his weakness during primetime like he did yesterday. What was his team thinking when they scheduled this press conference?

NBC’s Dishonest Edit Of Romney’s “Wawa Moment”

NBC is at it again with their deceptive edits. This time their target is Mitt Romney. Apparently NBC will stop at nothing to get Obama re-elected. Mind you that Comcast and General Electric both own NBC. GE’s CEO sits on one of Obama’s White House economic advisory boards and Comcast executives are bundlers for the Obama campaign. It should not come as a surprise when NBC and MSNBC’s news coverage is slanted in favor of Obama. The problem here as you will see is that their coverage in this case isn’t just slanted, it’s outright false and dishonest.

Wawa is apparently a chain of sub shops. Their gimmick is that customers order their subs on a touchscreen. By the time the customer pays the cashier, the sub is ready to be consumed. Mitt Romney visited a Wawa in Pennsylvania and spoke about it at one of his campaign stops. According to the NBC version of events, Romney is amazed that he can order a sub via a touch screen. Andrea Mitchell mocks Romney’s amazement and then dreams that this is Romney’s Supermarket check out lane moment. You’ll recall that in 1992 Bush 41 was made to look a fool, amazed by a check out scanner at a grocery store. That story of course was false at the time.

The truth in this case is that Romney wasn’t amazed by Wawa’s touch screen ordering system at all. He was in fact making a point about how inefficient the public sector is when compared to the private sector. Listen to his statement yourself, it’s clear as day he’s not the least bit interested in Wawa’s itself. His point is that through competition Wawa’s came up with their system. He cites an eye doctor who had to fill out a 33 page form for the government because he moved across town. He’s amazed not by Wawa’s touch screen but by the inefficiency of government, especially when compared to the private sector.

NBC should be ashamed of itself. Andrea Mitchell ought to as well. What’s funny about Mitchell is that she had the audacity to mock Romney for not having been to a Wawa’s before. We’re supposed to believe that Alan Greenspan’s wife is munching on Wawa subs every day for lunch. Give me a break. Mitchell had to have known about the deceptive editing, she’s clearly trying to attack Romney. It’s an absolute disgrace. Keep in mind NBC has always held Mitchell out as a legitimate reporter. There’s nothing legitimate about this story though.

There was a time when NBC and the mainstream networks could get away with deceptive edits like this. But they can’t anymore because of the internet. Back in 1992 when Bush 41 was unfairly attacked, by the time his team could put together a response proving the media wrong it was too late. The narrative took hold, his incompetence had been shown on the news for days. Now NBC pulls a stunt like this and in less than 24 hours Romney’s full comments are available online while bloggers and other media members can debunk the outrageously edited claims of NBC. The lie therefore cannot become part of the Romney narrative and in fact Romney looks all the better for it. What was a throw away point, not even terribly well argued, is what people will listen to and believe. They won’t believe the media.

NBC and Andrea Mitchell are a disgrace. Someone ought to be fired over there, whether it’s Mitchell or whatever leftist lackey edited the piece. The media loves to drone on about how Americans don’t trust government, pointing to how much we don’t approve of Congress or the Supreme Court. Americans also don’t trust the media, they lie to us as much as politicians do. What NBC and Andrea Mitchell did was nothing short of a lie. Why should we trust these people going forward?

UPDATE: Andrea Mitchell and MSNBC didn’t even acknowledge their dishonest editing during her show today. They glossed over it and offered no apology. How do they sleep at night knowing they lied yesterday?

Is The GOP Too Extreme For Reagan?

The Democrats have spent the better part of the last 50 years calling Republicans extreme. It’s expected that Democrats attack Republicans, accusing them of waging war on women, children, the elderly and anyone not earning over $250,000 a year. The Democrats are good at name calling, it masks the weakness of their arguments. Our ears perk up though when Republicans start calling our party extreme and not just turncoats and RINO’s like Joe Scarborough and David Brooks.

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush claims Ronald Reagan is too moderate for today’s GOP. The left-wing media ran with the story last week, which isn’t a shock at all. The media loves infighting in the Republican Party, especially when it involves a Bush. In order to believe Jeb Bush and the liberal media, we have to suspend all logic and critical thinking skills. What Jeb said simply isn’t true and we can see it in the history of the Republican Party dating from 1980. In fact, we could even go back to Barry Goldwater in 1964, after all deep in your heart you know he was right.

If Reagan is too moderate to get the GOP nomination today, then we must be nominating even more conservative candidates for the White House. We’re in the process of nominating Mitt Romney, a man who a decade ago called himself a progressive. He’s a man whose belief in the conservative cause seems to have begun around six years ago when he ran for President. He didn’t run Massachusetts as a flaming liberal but he hardly ran the state like a bona fide conservative. At best Romney was a moderate governor who perhaps became more conservative during his four years in that office by becoming pro-life. But if Jeb Bush is right, Mitt Romney must be to the right of Reagan. That would be news to Reagan, not to mention Romney.

In 2008 our party nominated John McCain for President. McCain is a lifelong moderate who has always been more comfortable working with liberals against conservatives. He’s the author of McCain-Feingold which unconstitutionally limited speech. He barely qualifies as pro-life and hasn’t met a tax he wouldn’t like to raise. McCain is a media darling, largely because he’s so critical of conservative Republicans. Jeb Bush seems to think McCain is to the right of Reagan, it’s a comical fantasy that even McCain wouldn’t truly buy.

George W. Bush is as close to Reagan the party has nominated since 1984. He lowered taxes, though not to Reagan’s level. He did have a strong interventionist foreign policy, not unlike Reagan’s though with clearly different enemies. Where they differ is that Reagan didn’t come into office proposing massive government programs such as the Prescription Drug law Bush supported. Reagan went along with domestic spending increases to get military spending increases which he used to destroy the Soviet Union. Bush is more moderate than Reagan was but he’s nowhere near as liberal as McCain or Romney.

Bob Dole was a moderate, just like Jeb Bush’s father. Dole never advanced conservatism during his years in the Senate. He ran a dreadful campaign largely because he couldn’t distinguish himself from Clinton. Bush 41 ran as a Reagan conservative and governed as the moderate he ran as in 1980 against Reagan. He broke his promise not to raise taxes and got snookered by the Democrats who never cut spending in an equal amount. These guys are to the right of Reagan? Hardly.

Looking at Congress, are we to pretend that John Boehner is to the right of Reagan? He isn’t even to the right of Newt Gingrich when Gingrich was Speaker. Surely Dennis Hastert isn’t an extreme right-winger. In the Senate, Bob Dole led the party from the mid 80′s to the mid 90′s followed by Trent Lott, Bill Frist and Mitch McConnell. These guys are extremists? Jeb Bush is either living in a fantasy land or he’s been hanging out in the Florida sun for too long.

Since 1980 the Republican Party hasn’t nominated a Presidential candidate more conservative than Ronald Reagan. Surely no one believes Mitt Romney is to Reagan’s right. If we look at leadership in the House and Senate, is there any of them since the 80′s to Reagan’s right? The notion that the GOP has become an “extreme” party is the figment of the left-wing media’s imagination. The Republican Party hasn’t become extreme, we don’t nominate candidates more conservative than Reagan. If Reagan cannot get the nomination in 2012, perhaps it’s because we’ve become too moderate a party that cannot stomach a conservative. But of course you won’t hear moderates like Jeb Bush say that and you can bet the media will never say it.

Obama’s Lack Of Vision Opens Door For Romney

President Obama’s “major” economic speech offered no new ideas and no plan for his second term. He seems to believe that he can blame Bush for the economy and therefore not be held responsible for not fixing it and/or making it worse during his 3 and a half years in office. Obama blames all his problems on Washington gridlock, as though he’s somehow not part of the gridlock. The result of Obama’s finger pointing and no second term plan is that in the Real Clear Politics average, he’s only up on Romney by 0.8%. Obama has 45.7% to Romney’s 44.9%. Romney has a very clear opening to exploit.

The shift in polls isn’t so much toward Romney as it is away from Obama. There is a group of independent voters who may have at one time leaned towards Obama but now aren’t so sure. They’re willing to give Romney a shot. It’s now up to Romney to convince them that he is capable and has a plan for the future. He must lay out his plan in a clear and concise manner and he must contrast his plan to the last four years under Obama. In two months he’ll have a very high profile opportunity to address the nation at the Republican Convention. Obviously we all know the debates will be important.

Romney must provide a simple economic plan based on the free market that focuses on lower taxes and fewer regulations. He must make the case that Obama’s upcoming taxmageddon, which will hit on January 1st and won’t be repealed if Obama is re-elected, will hurt the economy. Middle class taxes will rise, perhaps as much as $1700 for a family earning around $50,000. Capital gains taxes would rise 66%, taxes on dividends would nearly triple and the death tax would rise by 50%. Romney needs to drive this point home, Obama hasn’t even attempted to negotiate a deal with Republicans on the Bush tax cuts. Romney needs to make the case that under his administration he would keep the Bush tax cuts, that they’re good for the middle class and the country and he needs to make the case that they should be permanent so we don’t have tax uncertainty.

Romney also needs to come up with a heathcare plan. Repealing Obamacare, if it’s still law come the end of the month much less next January, isn’t enough of a plan to win the White House. Romney must propose free market reforms such as allowing the purchase of insurance over state lines and allowing small businesses to pool their risk. Romney has talked about this over the past week or so but he needs to but forth a comprehensive plan that’s simple to understand. Most importantly, he needs to promise that his bill won’t be 2,000 pages and it won’t be Romneycare.

The American people are turning from Obama. They haven’t yet turned to Romney. It’s up to him to seal the deal and prove to the American public that he’s someone worth voting for. He absolutely cannot rely on people coming out to the polls just to vote against Obama. The American people generally want someone they can vote for, in the very least we prefer this than going to the polls to vote against someone. Romney’s opening is there, the question is whether or not he can take advantage of it. This is still a 60-40 race favoring Obama. But with a few good proposals and a terrific convention speech, Romney can shrink it to 50-50 by the end of the summer. No opponent can hope for a better position heading into the fall against an incumbent. We’ll have to wait and see whether Romney can seize this moment

Obama’s “Major” Economic Speech A Dud

Obama gave an address in Cleveland which was billed as a major economic speech. The President droned on for 54 minutes, boring even his adoring press. He offered nothing new at all, which makes one wonder why this was billed as a major speech. He has no new policies, no new ideas and no new pieces of legislation to introduce. It makes you wonder why he thinks people will vote for him in November. This is a President completely devoid of ideas whose best argument seems to be that Republicans hate clean water, children, grandma and the middle class. During the address you were waiting for him to get out the Alpo can and accuse Republicans of wanting grandma to eat dog food.

Obama seems utterly convinced that the stalemate between the House and White House and Senate is the cause of all of our problems. That is when the cause of all our problems isn’t Bush. Does anyone believe that if Obama is re-elected the stalemate that currently exists in DC will go away? Few are predicting that the Democrats will win the House and it seems almost inevitable that the Republicans will win the Senate considering several high profile Dems are retiring in historic Republican states. If Obama is re-elected, the country will be asking for more stalemate, not less. Surely Obama knows this or does he really believe 2012 will be a 2008 repeat?

Part of the problem is that Obama is spending his time blaming politics in DC as though he isn’t part of the problem. He isn’t the President who told Republicans “I won” and therefore won’t be listening to any of your proposals. He isn’t the guy who refused to even attempt to get a single Republican to vote for Obamacare, even though there were two liberal Senators willing to listen and negotiate. That even liberal Sen. Olympia Snowe can’t be dealt with by Obama suggests the real problem in DC isn’t dastardly Republicans who hate Obama. The problem is Obama. Yet he seems to live in this fantasy world where he isn’t part of DC politics.

Even if there wasn’t a stalemate, Obama would still be blaming Bush. We’re three and a half years into Obama’s Presidency and he’s still blaming the last guy for all his problems. He simply refuses to take ownership for the economy, which is currently floundering thanks to his policies. The economy was on the down swing when Bush left office but Obama has done nothing to make it better. We had 389,000 new unemployment claims last week, which will no doubt be revised up by next weeks report. Our unemployment rate is 8.2% but if we counted the same number of people in the workforce as we did when Obama took office the unemployment rate would be around 11%.

Obama may have taken office during a downturn but he has completely failed to create government policies that will turn things around. Instead he spent a year on Obamacare, which no one wants. Since Republicans took control of the House, Obama has largely taken an all or nothing approach. Either the GOP does what he wants or he’ll do nothing at all. He won’t even negotiate with them. At some point it doesn’t matter what Bush left Obama, it’s up to the current President to fix things. He hasn’t done it. Yet his re-election sales pitch seems to be that we should give him four more years just to see if his plans, which haven’t worked so far, will eventually work.

Romney must be loving every second of this. Obama’s delivering meaningless “major” speeches that don’t include any new proposals or even the slightest outlook for a second term. His scare tactics are almost laughable at this point. The mainstream press is bored to tears and only the most ardent Obama ideologue is excited about his speech. He would have been better off keeping his mouth shut in Cleveland and instead enjoying a pastrami sandwich with the gang at Corky & Lenny’s. Romney has a real opening if this sort of economic speech is what Obama will be relying on for the next five months.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 141 other followers