Battle For OWS Control Heats Up

April 17, 2012 Leave a comment

There is a battle underway within the Occupy Wall Street crowd. A so-called battle for the soul of OWS is being waged between the “old” left, which is apparently represented by Obama supporting leftists and the “new” left which is apparently supported by people more radical and left-wing than moveon.org. Adbusters appears to be at the forefront of this OWS rebellion, though there are others. The question arises who is now in control of OWS. You get the feeling like the more peaceful Obama supporters are losing out to the more violent radicals.

What is this rebellion exactly? One thing to keep in mind is that all the OWS leaders are inter-connected. Van Jones, Stephen Lerner, the moveon.org gang, Adbusters, they’re all connected. The man giving money to everyone is George Soros. At first glance this battle appears to be one between the leaders of OWS and the rank and file of OWS. But that isn’t the case, this is a battle being waged in the upper leadership of OWS. The rank and file, as with all leftist movements, are just pawns being played by their leadership. The question coming out of this OWS rebellion is which group within the leadership will come out victorious and in fuller control of the OWS movement and in their minds the battle is over which group of leaders will take over once the US government is toppled. (that is their stated goal, as absurd as it is)

As it gets warmer we’re going to see more OWS protests. We’ve already seen many of them get violent this year, which suggests that in the very least the more radical of the OWS crowd has support. The radicals want violence and have advocated for so-called black bloc violence. A black bloc is a large group of people dressed head to toe in black who engage in violence. The purpose is to prevent the police from identifying any individual. In New York OWS radicals engaged in black bloc tactics, targeting at least two businesses.

If we look at OWS from a purely political standpoint, if the violent radicals take over the movement it can’t be anything but bad for Obama. Riots caused by leftists he’s associated with would destroy his re-election chances. Flashback to 1968, riots and violence caused by leftists ensured that Richard Nixon won. The far left already has their guy in the White House, it’s understandable why certain factions in OWS don’t want violence. They want to rally support for Obama’s re-election. These people truly believe that OWS is the leftist version of the Tea Party. They believe their goals are only four more years of Obama away from being realized. Their sincerity shouldn’t be doubted.

The problem though is that the left has always harbored bigger radicals than moveon.org. It has always contained a violent, chaotic element, whether it’s the Black Panthers, Adbusters or Anonymous. The goals are all the same, they all want a fundamental transformation of America away from capitalism towards socialism. Once we get to socialism, the left will fight with itself for ultimate control with the winner deciding socialism, fascism or communism. OWS has jumped the gun, fighting with themselves before they actually have full control. Which means one of two things, either the leadership is full of power hungry fools or they truly believe revolution is right around the corner and/or here. If the latter is true, it ought to terrify you. What do they know, what are they planning?

Ultimately OWS’s leadership believes their movement has more nationwide support than it really does. The radicals want to create mass chaos right now so as to push the nation towards the national salvation of socialism. In chaos the better organized wins and they know they’re better organized thus it’s in their interest to create the chaos necessary to force change. What the Obama types are legitimately concerned about is a backlash from the public against Obama if chaos happens. They rightfully see that the public will blame an already fairly unpopular President and it will set their movement back. How OWS plays out this spring and summer is anyone’s guess. There will be violence though, the violent faction will see to it.

Filed under ows Tagged with , , , , , ,

Stephen Lerner, OWS Organize Next Round of Marxist Protests

March 5, 2012 Leave a comment

Stephen Lerner is a former big wig at SEIU and current board member. Last year you’ll recall that Lerner had proposed targeting JP Morgan Chase in an effort to destroy the bank. Lerner’s attempt to bring down JP Morgan Chase ultimately morphs into Occupy Wall Street. OWS in fact did try to shut down banks and were successful at temporarily closing branch offices. OWS has also been successful in temporarily shutting down ports on the west coast.

The media has portrayed OWS as a group of college students frustrated with the lack of jobs and student loan debt. In reality, OWS is a highly organized protest movement being coordinated by unions, socialists, Marxists and people like Lerner and Van Jones. The media has ignored the socialist, anti-capitalist bent to OWS and instead focused on their vague call for “democracy.” In reality, what Lerner and OWS are really after is the abolition of capitalism.

Breitbart, presumably before his death, got hold video from a meeting between Lerner and various leaders within the OWS movement. It exposes what OWS is really after. They declare that capitalism and democracy are incompatible. Let’s take a look at that a little more because the media has ignored the anti-capitalist bent to OWS while they have played up the pro-democracy message of the protesters.

Most Americans believe we live in a democracy. In fact, we have a constitutional republic. Nevertheless, most Americans think we have a democracy and pols are endlessly talking about American democracy. The democracy that most Americans believe in, that being our constitutional republic, is not the same democracy that OWS believes in. The OWS definition of democracy is radically different than what most Americans think of when they hear the term democracy. That’s what makes the media’s portrayal of OWS as a bunch of democracy fighters so devious. The public is never told that the OWS version of democracy is not the same as theirs.

The OWS version of democracy is anti-capitalist. It’s socialist, if not outright Marxist. Americans overwhelmingly oppose both socialism and Marxism, which is why the media never bothers to tell the public that the democracy OWS is protesting for isn’t what we think it is. The media is supportive of OWS and its goals, which is why the most negative parts of OWS are ignored. It’s also why the OWS goals are never reported on.

Lerner and company in the video posted by Breitbart actively support the overthrow of capitalism. They take it even further though. They support occupying foreclosed houses so that the homes. In short they support allowing people who don’t pay their mortgage bill to stay in a home indefinitely for free. They’re willing to go so far as to protest at the home in order to achieve this. They also want to occupy shareholder meetings and disrupt corporate business.

Lerner and company want to not only occupy homes and shareholder meetings (they cite the Bank of America shareholder meeting in Charlotte as a targeted event) but they also want workers to organize strikes. In short they want to completely collapse the American economy. You might ask why they would want to do this. It’s simple. If they can take down the American economy, they can then be the leaders who take power and create a new socialism in America. It’s all in the video, they want a new morality, a new economy and really a new everything.

Let’s face facts, we’re dealing with Marxist revolutionaries who the media portrays as average people and college students frustrated with lack of jobs. In reality, OWS is a highly organized group of extremely leftists who are agitating for a radical end to the American economy and a complete shift in morality. This is nothing if not Marxist. Stephen Lerner, SEIU, Van Jones and a host of other radical leftists are at the center of OWS organizing all of this chaos. It is not an organic protest, it is highly organized. They do not support the sort of democracy the American people support. They don’t simply want hope and change, they want Marxist revolution.

Filed under ows Tagged with , , , , , ,

Leftists Busy Organizing 99% Spring Protests

February 28, 2012 3 Comments

If one were to listen to the mainstream media you would think Occupy Wall Street has gone away. But for a handful of violent clashes with police, the OWS movement has moved out of the headlines. Last year the media didn’t warn the country about the impending Wall Street protests organized far in advance by Stephen Lerner of SEIU, Van Jones and others. They then pretended like the movement was organic, suddenly popping up out of nowhere. Never mind that the left was on record concerning their plans to protest banks, investment houses and the rich generally. The media is pulling the same stunt again.

OWS is set to return April 9th with something called a “99% Spring.” This supposedly non-violent week of protests is being organized by a who’s who of leftists and leftist organizations. The UAW, Moveon.org, Engage, Progressive  Democrats of America, Van Jones, Sarita Gupta etc. These folks are planning for massive protests throughout the country during the week of April 9th. Yet the media is going to portray the protests as an organic, spontaneous event. Never mind that the left issued a press release on the subject on February 15th and has spent many months organizing the protests.

It appears the UAW is taking the lead in organizing the 99% Spring. This is interesting in light of the fact that the UAW was the biggest beneficiary of Obama’s car industry bailout. The UAW isn’t the only one organizing this though as several George Soros funded organizations such as moveon.org are also organizing.

While the 99% Spring rhetoric is peaceful and points towards Martin Luther King’s non-violent protests, we must not forget the violence of Occupy Wall Street. What the OWS folks are doing with the 99% Spring is trying to avoid a violent meltdown similar to 1968. It seems unlikely given the violence of OWS and the racism and anti-Semitism also found at OWS protests. They can talk about non-violence until they’re blue in the face, the fact is OWS was violent and many of the 99% Spring organizers have advocated violence in the past. In short, non-violence is just a buzz word meant to placate people who aren’t really paying attention. It means nothing to the organizers.

The whole point of this movement is to overthrow the American government as we know it. They want to enforce socialism, if not outright Marxism. Last year OWS at times advocated killing capitalists and in the very least sought to demonize anyone with money. Well, anyone with money not associated with them. George Soros is a good rich guy, so are rich Hollywood leftists. All the other guys are evil.

When the 99% Spring begins, all organized by the UAW, Van Jones and any number of other leftists, the media will act shocked by the grassroots nature of it all. They’ll be amazed at how much these protesters care. The truth is that just like OWS, the 99% Spring will be nothing more than a highly organized protest meant to bring chaos to the streets and push the country towards totalitarian socialism. The media won’t tell you that but if you follow what these people are, how they’re organizing and what they’re goals are it becomes very clear. The far left has a formula, they’re up front about it if you dig around a little bit. The dirty secret is that OWS and the 99% Spring are nothing but an organized astro-turf protest.

Filed under socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Soros Behind Coordinated Attack On US Constitution

February 7, 2012 9 Comments

There is within our government an effort to both discredit and overthrow the Constitution. Several things have happened within the last few weeks that appear coordinated to both weaken our faith in the Constitution and increase our interest in other Constitutions. All of this is coming from the left, with George Soros at the likely center of it.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Badar Ginsberg told an Egyptian news station that Egypt shouldn’t look to the US Constitution for their new Constitution. Instead Egypt should look to South Africa, Canada or the EU. This is interesting on a couple of levels. First, why is Ginsberg doing an interview with Egyptian journalists? Doesn’t that strike anyone as odd? She spoke glowingly of South Africa’s Constitution, which advocates an “open society” and social  justice. Who pushes for an open society? George Soros. Who helped fund last year’s Arab Spring, particularly in Egypt? George Soros. Who and her husband are affiliated with Soros? Ginsberg of course. So perhaps her connection to Soros made way for an odd interview between an American Supreme Court Justice and an Egyptian television station.

Magically the New York Times just happened to get into the fray this week with a piece questioning the importance of the US Constitution in world affairs. It’s funny how obscure Egyptian tv interviews just happen to appear and make the rounds on the internet and just a few days later the Times publishes an attack piece on the Constitution. The Times also writes glowingly of “sexier” new Constitutions such as Canada’s and South Africa’s. Such Constitutions create rights out of thin air, such as the right to food, health care and education. The socialists quoted by the Times criticize the limited ability to amend our Constitution as well.

All of this is meant to create doubt in American’s minds about our Constitution. What the Times and Ginsberg won’t tell you is that the rights granted to us in the Constitution, besides being endowed by our creator, are consistent and can’t easily be taken away by the state. This is unlike the other Constitutions, which don’t guarantee the right to free speech or religion across the board. In Canada for example, pastors are arrested for preaching against homosexuals. South Africa’s Constitution essentially ensures socialism, which is perhaps why the left loves it so much. But it does little by the way of truly guaranteeing freedom. After all, their constitution is easily amended and can thus take away rights on a whim.

All of these phony new socialist rights just happened to come into play in the last couple of weeks here in the US. As you know the Obama administration decided that religious organizations must provide contraception via their health insurance and/or via their hospitals. The newly created “right” to contraception trumps the Constitutional right to the free exercise of religion. It isn’t simply that an individual can purchase contraception, something the Supreme Court determined decades ago was a right. It’s now that a religious organization must fund it even if they are morally and religiously opposed to it.

In other words, Roman Catholics aren’t free to be Roman Catholics so long as the government determines that an individual’s government created right is infringed. The Obama administration has in essence determined that not only do you have the right to purchase and possess contraception but you have the right to force someone else to pay for even to the point that a religious organization is denied the free exercise of their faith.

What we’re seeing by the Obama administration is an acceptance of the world’s law and the world’s constitutions. In doing this Obama is calling into doubt whether the rights found in our Constitution are relevant or even worthy of keeping. It just happens that Ginsberg does the same thing and the New York Times runs a hit piece on the Constitution. The goal here is to cause Americans to doubt their Constitution and its relevance.

Meanwhile Soros is gleefully hoping for violence to break out this year. The Occupy movement and any violence associated with it are all meant to cause Americans to doubt our government and our system. Keep in mind the far left, largely funded by Soros, has the solution in hand. They’ll be there to offer us a solution to the problems they created. Their hope is that Americans, doubting their “old fashion” Constitution and frustrated by violence and lawlessness, will  give in and accept the new open society of the far left.

In short, this is all very staged and orchestrated. The left is making quite an effort to discredit the American Constitution while pumping up the socialist constitutions of Canada, the EU and South Africa. They’re creating new rights in the socialist Constitutional tradition that directly contradict our own Constitution. Meanwhile the very same people are funding and orchestrating OWS and the violence associated with it, even going so far as to hope for it. Now more than ever we must return to the Constitution and embrace the rights and protections contained therein. There is most certainly a far left war against the document and our way of life.

Filed under George Soros Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Obama’s Class Warfare Destroyed By IRS Numbers

January 28, 2012 Leave a comment

President Obama’s first campaign speech of the year, the State of the Union, was the opening of what will be a 10 month class war. Obama demands that the rich “pay their fair share.” He trots out Warren Buffet’s secretary, claiming she pays a higher tax rate than her boss. First, we should recognize that tax rate and amount paid are two different things. Second, we should recognize that Buffet earns most of his money as capital gains. The capital gains rate is 15%. The IRS reports that 97% of Americans pay less than 15% in income tax. Meaning that if Buffet’s secretary actually pays a higher rate than her boss, she’s likely earning in excess of $200,000.

If one were to listen to Obama one would believe that there are hoards of billionaires running around the country screwing the rest of us out of what’s “rightfully” ours. Unfortunately the IRS data suggests something quite different. 2009 is the most recent year of IRS data available. There were only 8.274 Americans who had income over $10 million. (see table 1.1, 2009) Those people had total income of $240 billion. So even if the government were to tax these people at 100%, the truth is that it wouldn’t fund the government a whole month. Mind you we have a Federal budget that is almost $4 trillion. Currently this group pays $6 million in income tax a piece, totaling around $50 billion. Obama wants to double that (assuming everyone is only paying capital gains) to $100 billion. That won’t even pay for a week of the Federal government’s budget.

In fact, if we taxed people earning over $1 million at a rate of 100% the Federal government would only take in $726 billion in tax revenue. That doesn’t even pay for the Federal government at current spending rates for 3 months. Keep in mind we’re talking about taxing at 100%. Obama is talking about raising taxes on these people from 15 to 30% assuming these folks are earning all of their money from capital gains, which we know many on the lower end are not.

The amount of revenue raised via Obama’s proposed tax increase is peanuts compared to the size of the Federal budget and the Federal deficit. Let’s say the government manages to take $100 billion in additional revenue based on Obama’s tax increases. That will reduce the budget deficit from $1.4 trillion to $1.2 trillion. The havoc it would create in the market though would be much greater. Faced with the inability to earn a fair return on an investment, people with money to invest will be less likely to take risks. After all, if there is a limited reward for risk taking most people won’t take the risk. It will be good for low risk investments but bad for the sort of high risk investments that move the economy forward.

In other words, Obama’s proposed tax increase will do nothing for the budget deficit but will substantially harm the economy. Thankfully it has no chance of passing because the House Republicans won’t even consider such a bill. That is however exactly what Obama wants. Remember, this is a class war battle Obama is waging. He’s pretending like there are billionaires out there not “paying their fair share” when in reality they are already.  Half the people in this country don’t pay income taxes, those making over $200,000 pay the vast majority. The hoards of billionaires out there not paying “their fair share” simply don’t exist based on the IRS data.

Truth has never mattered to the Obama administration. It’s going to be up to the Republican nominee, presumably Romney, to present the truth to the American people. So far Romney hasn’t done it. We can only hope he takes on Obama head on over this stuff. Tax increases on the rich simply won’t bring in revenue sufficient for cutting the deficit. Furthermore, the harm that increased taxes will cause far outweigh the potential minor benefits. Class warfare cannot be allowed to win.

Filed under 2012 election Tagged with , , , , , , ,

Americans Fear Big Government More Than Big Business

December 15, 2011 Leave a comment

An interesting new Gallup poll shows that 64% of Americans fear big government. Only 26% fear big business and a paltry 8% fear big labor. Even more interesting is that 48% of Democrats fear big government. The Gallup poll suggests a couple of things. First, Occupy Wall Street isn’t resonating with the general public because the general public isn’t particularly afraid of big business. In fact, the numbers seem to show why the Tea Party was initially so successful. Second, the rank and file Democrats are not totally on board with Obama’s socialist agenda.

Occupy Wall Street was always going to be a difficult sell to the American people. It’s hard to find a majority of Americans willing to tolerate a group of smelly college students taking over parks while spouting hateful and anti-Semitic slogans while defecating on cop cars. The very language of Occupy Wall Street is violent and off putting. But even putting all of that aside, the general public isn’t behind the OWS cause. Big business may be a big boogie man that no one likes. But it isn’t what the American people particularly fear. Absent a true, heart felt fear of the power of big business, support for OWS was never going to get above 50%. It’s support has remained in the 30%.

In fact, the fear of big government is what propelled the Tea Party into prominence. There’s a reason why the Tea Party wasn’t initially hated by the American people. It’s because the Tea Party echoed the public’s fear of big government. The Tea Party has, since 2010, squandered it’s support. Largely by getting elected to the big government the public fears. But this Gallup poll shows why OWS will not be electorally successful while the Tea Party was.

Democrats are split right now. That doesn’t bode well going into a major election year. Nearly half of Democrats fear big government. Who represents big government? Barack Obama. Perhaps some of those Democrats fear big government because the Republicans won the House. That’s a fair position for a Democrat to take. But There have been enough Democrats over the years who fear big government to suggest that at least some of these Democrats fear the sort of big government Obama supports.

Perhaps some of these Democrats are Hillary supporters who never fell in love with Obama. The worst case for Obama is that these Democrats are Reagan Democrats who are willing to leave Obama for the Republican nominee. That half of Democrats fear big government makes one wonder how hard these people will campaign for Obama next year. Especially so in must win states like Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Republicans must seize on these Gallup findings. We must nominate a candidate who will offer a stark contrast to Obama, a candidate who can declare Obama the candidate of big government. Whether Newt, with all of his government solutions, can pull this off remains to be seen. Romney would have just as difficult a time as Newt, what with Romneycare on his resume. Somehow the winner needs to be able to present himself as the anti-big government candidate. There’s clearly a market for such a candidate.

Filed under 2012 election Tagged with , , , , , ,

OWS West Coast Blockade Will Destroy The Middle Class

December 12, 2011 Leave a comment

The Occupy Wall Street organizers are planning a shutdown of west coast ports today. OWS was marginally successful in shutting down the Oakland port earlier this year. Whether they can manage to shut down ports from San Diego to Vancouver via protest blockades remains to be seen. Their goal is to attack corporate profits. In reality their actions, if successful, will do nothing but hurt your average employee.

Keri Koch (presumably not related to the evil Koch Brothers) of Shut Down the Ports Working Group of Occupy Portland (only the left would come up with a name like that and proudly list it on their resumes) had this to say about the port blockade:

We will not stand for corporate profits at the expense of working people, we will not stand for attacks on workers, and we will not allow our schools to be closed, social services slashed, and families to be impoverished by your greed!

The boogie man of corporate profits is ever so amusing. I wonder if Miss Koch could provide us the names of schools that are being closed but would otherwise be open but for corporate profits. In fact, one wonders how she makes the connection between corporate profits and governments closing schools or cutting “social services.” The two really don’t have anything directly to do with each other. But it’s a nice sound bite that makes it look like corporate profits are to blame for all the problems of the world when in reality the problem isn’t corporate profits but government.

But let’s look beyond Miss Koch’s absurd connections and look at what the end result would be of a successful blockade of the west coast. We can only assume that a successful blockade would last more than a single day as OWS has tried to occupy parks for weeks and months on end. Who would be hurt if the west coast suffered a total blockade? No doubt corporate profits would be hurt as companies wouldn’t be able to ship goods and raw materials overseas nor would they be able to receive goods and raw materials from overseas. So the blockade would be successful in destroying corporate profits.

However in destroying corporate profits the left would destroy all manufacturing that is dependant on west coast shipping. Unable to use the west coast to ship, American manufacturers would have no place to ship their finished or partially finished goods or raw materials to China, Japan, Thailand or anywhere else in Asia. Who would that hurt? American workers of course. It would shut down factories, plants and mines across the country. It would substantially hurt farming. It would hurt the entire shipping industry. American workers, farmers, laborers and longshoremen would lose their jobs because their companies would have no means to ship goods or receive goods to produce products.

But of course it doesn’t stop there. Not only would people directly reliant on shipping via the west coast be hurt but so would all of those who are indirectly reliant. The local grocery store, fast food restaurant, clothing stores, lawyers, accountants and a host of other people would lose money and/or jobs because their customers or clients in the manufacturing or farming sector would lose theirs. Most of these people are the 99% that OWS claims to be protesting for.

There are unintended consequences concerning the west coast blockade that the average person needs to think about before supporting it. The goal of OWS is to create chaos to force “change” (read: socialism) on America. No doubt a complete blockade of the west coast would create chaos, which ought to make us suspicions of whether or not OWS leaders have thought about the consequences of their actions. They probably have and they don’t care how many people lose their jobs. In fact, they’ll argue the more who lose their jobs the better because it creates more chaos and anger. But before rank and file Democrats or college students hop on board with occupying the west coast, think about how many millions will lose their jobs if the west coast is shut down. This isn’t about corporate profits, it’s about middle class jobs. OWS is trying to destroy the middle class in the name of destroying corporate profits.

Filed under socialism Tagged with , , , ,

Bias Media Refuses To Link White House Shooter With OWS

November 17, 2011 4 Comments

Oscar Ortega-Hernandez is alleged to have fired two bullets at the White House late last week. Ortega was also allegedly hanging around the Occupy Wall Street gang in DC before he shot at the White House. It appears that he has no actual affiliation with them, yet he was apparently mingling with them. What makes Ortega’s connection with OWS so interesting is that the mainstream press is completely ignoring it.

That is in stark contrast to Jared Loughner, the savage who shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Loughner had no political affiliations yet the mainstream press spent the better part of a week decrying “violent” right-wing rhetoric. The mainstream press spent a week attacking the Tea Party as violent, Sarah Palin in particular. In fact just this week Diane Sawyer continued link Palin to the shooting by pointing out the fact that Palin “targeted” Giffords for defeat during the 2010 election.

So where is the media outrage over the violent rhetoric coming out of the OWS crowd? Why isn’t the press linking violent OWS rhetoric with Ortega? You can bet that if Ortega has hanging out at a Tea Party rally shortly before shooting at the White House the media would demand that the Tea Party be forcibly disbanded by the government. Yet OWS is never mentioned by the mainstream press, no connection between Ortega and OWS is ever discussed.

Ortega in fact has more of a connection to OWS than Loughner did to the Tea Party. Ortega at least was seen hanging around the OWS hanging around DC. Loughner had never been to a Tea Party event and was a political dissenter who hated everyone. Make no mistake, both of these guys are wicked criminals who need to be locked up for a long time. But the media treatment of both incidents shows off their massive left-wing bias.

After the Giffords shooting the media went on for a week, showing clip after clip of allegedly violent Tea Party statements. Most of the statements had nothing to do with violence and were little more than analogies. Nevertheless, where are the examples of OWS violent rhetoric? In fact, why isn’t the media talking about actual violence at OWS? There have been two murders, a rape, multiple sexual assaults, countless theft crimes etc. Over 3,000 have been arrested. OWS is allegedly having a “Day of Action” in New York today wherein they will attempt to shut down Wall Street. One OWS protester threatened to throw molotov cocktails into Macy’s.

So where is the mainstream press on all of this? They’re silent. They haven’t reported on the violence at OWS and when they have they’ve blamed the police. They don’t show videos of violent rhetoric coming from OWS, they don’t keep an arrest tally and they don’t comment on the murder, rape and general mayhem. They also haven’t rushed to judgment by accusing Ortega of being part of OWS. Yet they did rush to blame the Tea Party for Jared Loughner.

It’s as simple as this, the mainstream press is left-wing. They agree with OWS and so they report it in the most positive light. They disagree with the Tea Party so they paint it in the most negative light possible. A Congressman is shot and it must be the fault of the Tea Party. A nut hangs out with OWS and shoots at the White House, the media doesn’t make the connection between the two. It all begs the question why left-wing media bias is even up for debate.

Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with , , , , , ,

OWS Kicked Out Of Zuccotti Park For A Moment

November 15, 2011 Leave a comment

As we have stated before, the Occupy Wall Street protests are little more than a highly organized and planned left-wing event. The goal is to create chaos so that the left can further take over by protecting the middle class from the chaotic rabble. This has happened in other countries successfully, apparently the left thinks it can work here. The OWS protesters have been caught defecating on the streets and disease is common place. In Vermont and California there have been murders. In Cleveland there was a rape and there have been numerous reports of sexual assault at OWS encampments.

Last night after nearly two months New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg finally cleared Zuccotti Park. Nearly 1,000 cops were needed to clear the park. Around 70 anarchists were arrested. Bloomberg is about two months late in evicting these people. As it stands, the city is going to clean the park before letting the OWS rabble back in. This time they allegedly won’t be able to pitch tents in the park. We’ll see how long that rule lasts.

Since September, OWS has resulted in over 3,000 arrests, two murders, at least one rape, multiple sexual assaults, multiple theft crimes and disease. OWS has included multiple examples of mass anti-Semitism. It’s cost cities and local governments tens of millions in police and other security and clean up. Yet the mainstream press glosses over all of the crime, all of the cost and all of the negatives. The mainstream press pretends like these are heroic kids fighting for a cause. We’ll of course have to pretend that those kids actually know what they’re fighting for as it’s been clear throughout that the kids on the ground don’t really know why they’re there.

It’s been interesting watching the mainstream media bias in action. They’ve glossed over all of the negatives with OWS, claiming that the violence and racist statements are only from the fringe. Yet with the Tea Party the press declared that organizers were responsible for everything that was said or done at the rallies. Newsbusters has a good rundown of quotes from the New York Times dismissing the OWS violence and racism as fringe while declaring the Tea Party responsible for everything that happens at their rallies. Bias in media is real and this is the perfect example.

It should be interesting to see what happens to OWS in the next few months. If Bloomberg sticks to his no tents declaration, once winter sets in OWS at Zuccotti Park is all but done. There has been talk of a spring offensive. The far left has exposed itself via OWS as not really being the peace loving hipsters they’ve pretended. The very language of their movement is violent and war like. They likely argue that they are fighting a war. But that is a message that doesn’t go over well with the majority of the 99% who just want law and order to rule the day. In any event, it ought to be interesting to see how the leftists regroup after winter. Perhaps next spring they’ll institute a no rape rule or perhaps a no defecating on the streets rule.

Filed under socialism Tagged with , , , , ,

OWS Supported By Radicals; Is No Tea Party

November 1, 2011 Leave a comment

A list of Occupy Wall Street supporters is making it’s way around the internet. The list of OWS supporters includes the American Nazi Party, Communist Party USA, Revolutionary Communist Party, Black Panters, Nation of Islam, CAIR, the Ayatollah Khamenei, Hezbollah, the Communist governments of North Korea and China, former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke and the Marxist Student Union. This isn’t simply a group of dumb, smelly hippies who want a job after they graduate as the media is portraying them. It’s a group of radical, extreme leftists and anti-Semites.

This is not the leftist version of the Tea Party. In fact, it isn’t like the Tea Party at all. The Tea Party sought to work within in the system to cut government spending and defeat (now repeal) Obamacare. OWS doesn’t seek to work within the system, the openly seek revolution which would mean eliminating our current system and replacing it entirely. The Tea Party rallies weren’t so much about protesting as much as they were about networking. The Tea Party rallies of 2009 saw less attendance in 2010 but more political involvement because of the networking done the previous year. The Tea Party doesn’t need to hold massive rallies these days, all their work is being done behind the scenes.

The total number of arrests at Tea Party rallies across the nation was 0. There have been over 2,700 arrests at OWS protests. There were no rapes or acts of violence at any Tea Party. There have been over a dozen reported so far at OWS. There were no robberies, no one had anything stolen at Tea Party rallies. At OWS there have been consistent complaints of food, computers, cell phones and cameras being stolen. Most recently a deaf man was raped at OWS in New York.

So these rallies aren’t the Tea Party at all. In fact, they’re the opposite of the Tea Party. They’re lawless, revolutionary and they don’t go home after a couple hours. OWS protesters are busy listening to Communist professors like Alex Callinicos who told the crowd that violence could only be avoided if the so-called 1% obeyed the 99%, which he alleged would never happen. In other words, Callinicos is telling OWS protesters to prepare for violence. This fits perfectly with the list of OWS supporters, most of which endorse armed revolution.

Now that it’s getting cold out only the most diehard leftists remain. The trust fund college students and other assorted college students have largely left the Wall Street protest. What’s left are the homeless bumming organic chicken dinners off of George Soros and the most diehard, extremist left-wing elements. Yet the media will not report this. The media will not tell you that radical Communist groups are actively supporting OWS. They won’t tell you that radical Islamic socialist groups are supporting OWS. They certainly won’t tell you that the Nazi’s and David Duke are supporting OWS. They’re hiding the truth and they’re lying to the American people by drawing a direct line between OWS and the Tea Party.

OWS in the short term will be a failure. It’s going to die out once it really gets cold in New York. If there is more violence, Obama and the Democrats stand to lose big time because they’re on record supporting the protests. In the long run though, we on the right should be deeply concerned. The left has always been better organized than we have been. OWS shows us just how organized they are. These guys are capable of organizing massive nation and worldwide protests and they’re capable of making them appear to be organic, grassroots efforts. It ought to make us all wonder what the organizers of OWS have in store for spring 2013. 

 

Filed under socialism Tagged with , , , , , ,

← Older posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers