Radical Racist Left Seizes On Trayvon Martin, Threatens Violence

The death of Trayvon Martin has brought all of the race baitors out of the woodwork. Martin died when a self appointed neighborhood watchman, George Zimmerman, shot him. Zimmerman hasn’t been arrested, the death was apparently determined to be an act of self defense. Race baitors have suggested otherwise, painting Zimmerman as a racist who sought out and killed Martin because he’s black. Zimmerman in the media has been portrayed as white, which has turned this situation into a massive racial free for all.

There’s only one problem. George Zimmerman isn’t white. Zimmerman is a Spanish speaking Hispanic from a multiracial family. That of course doesn’t mean he can’t be an anti-black racist, he may very well be. But it changes the racial undertones of this situation. Of course the media continues to portray Zimmerman as white and race baitors in the black community continue to as well. Their purpose is to portray America as a racist nation where blacks have to fear for their lives at the hands of wicked, racist whites. Reporting that Zimmerman is in fact Hispanic and likely multiracial destroys the narrative.

And what a narrative it is. We have high school students storming out of class because Zimmerman hasn’t been charged. Never mind that they don’t have all the information because the investigation is still going on. The students are of course being egged on by their leftist teachers. Al Sharpton is in Florida threatening violence. Louis Farrakhan is threatening retaliation, presumably against white people even though the shooter isn’t white. MSNBC host Karen Finney blamed Martin’s death on Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Not to be out done President Obama tried to personalize the whole situation by claiming that Martin would have looked just like him.

In short, all the leftists are out in force on this one local incident. Why is that? Because they have a political reason for doing this, they’re trying demonize whites and they’re subtly suggesting that voting against Obama is equal to racism. Their whole narrative, which is that whites hate blacks, is destroyed with the fact that Zimmerman isn’t white. When we look at the black leadership’s reaction, it’s nothing short of outrageous. Sharpton and Farrakhan both threatened violence over this death. Obama absurdly tried to personalize it, even though just like the Prof. Louis Gates situation he doesn’t know all the facts. None of us do.

It may very well be that this death wasn’t an act of self defense and thus wasn’t justified. It may be that Zimmerman, if he isn’t a racist at least has anti-black tendencies. It would be odd considering he allegedly has black family members, but anything is possible. A Grand Jury is set to hear this case in April, the facts will come out then. But until then, turning this situation into a giant attack on white people by jumping to conclusions is nothing short of outrageous. Of course when Al Sharpton is involved anything short of outrageous would be shocking.

Everyone needs to calm down and let the Grand Jury do its job. We need to have faith in our legal system. To venture a guess, a Grand Jury won’t indict Zimmerman with first degree murder because absent evidence we don’t know of yet there doesn’t appear to be the necessary intent. But they could indict him with second degree murder or manslaughter. Or perhaps evidence will show that Martin was up to no good and threatened Zimmerman which then justified the shooting. But we have to let the legal process work its way out rather than jumping to conclusions, accusing whites of collective racism, threatening violence and retaliation.

When Will Obama Explain The Mission In Libya?

“The President does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” – Senator Barack Obama in the Boston Globe, 2007

Obama continues his South American trip today after having played soccer with children in Brazil. Since the UN Resolution was passed on Thursday and American troops were used on Saturday the President still hasn’t explained what the goal of the mission in Libya is. Removing Gaddafi apparently isn’t the goal of the mission, which begs the question what exactly the goal of the mission is. Meanwhile Louis Farrakhan had a sharp warning for Obama on a Chicago radio station (it gets good at the 7:21 mark) while Gaddafi pens a letter to Obama calling him his dear son.

The arab world has descended into chaos while the President lives it up in South America. We’re now three days into our mission in Libya and the President has yet to explain why we’re at war with Libya. He has yet to define the mission to Speaker John Boehner’s satisfaction, in fact the President hasn’t sought counsel from Congress at all. To busy playing soccer or going to beach to talk to Congress I suppose. If ever there was a time when our nation cannot afford an absent President it is right now. Unfortunately President Present cannot be found three days after he ordered our troops into combat in Libya and five days after he announced his support for a Libyan no fly zone.

Farrakhan’s comments were very interesting. It is clear that Farrakhan believes in an Islamic socialist revolution. He clearly subscribes to the black liberation theology that Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright believes, albeit the black Muslim version of it. Farrakhan is sending a clear message to Obama. Back off in Libya or he’ll be in jeopardy. I don’t know if Obama knows what Farrakhan’s threat is or not but there is clearly an implied threat within Farrakhan’s statements. The middle east is on fire thanks to the Islamic socialists that Farrakhan supports. He seems to believe more is on the way and perhaps socialist revolution is on the way to the United States, at least in Farrakhan’s mind. He clearly is warming the President to join the revolution or get out of the way.

Interestingly Gaddafi’s statement to Obama hits at Obama’s colonial past. One of the theories out there about Obama is that he’s simply an anti-colonialist, which is why he tends not to talk proudly about the United States. Clearly Gaddafi thinks this is the case, otherwise he wouldn’t have said it. There may be some truth to Obama’s anti-colonial outlook as evidenced by the fact that it took nearly a month to support a no fly zone and Obama’s near absence since the war began. Couple that with Obama’s wishy washy statements about Gaddafi and I dare say that the Colonel’s letter may grab at Obama’s heart strings. Keep in mind, this is an oil war being pushed by the French and British as much as it’s a war to rid the world of Gaddafi.

At this point I’m wondering if we’ll ever get an explanation from Obama about the war in Libya. The President seems conflicted in the matter, at least when we take into account his historic position on Gaddafi, Islamic socialism and colonialism. Having a President whose heart isn’t in a war he started isn’t the way to go. If Obama’s heart isn’t in this battle he should get us out of the war now. This isn’t a war started by Bush or created by Bush, it’s soley created by Obama. Unlike Bush, Obama hasn’t even explained to us why we’re at war or what the objective is.

We need the President to come home. His trip to South America appears not just frivolous but absurd. Obama needs to come home, speak with Congressional leaders (two ways rather than the one way that has happened so far) and most importantly he needs to speak to the American people and clearly lay out what the purpose is of the war in Libya. He needs to do this in primetime on a weeknight, preferably tonight. But of course, it’s unlikely to happen. There are children in South America who he wants to play soccer with.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 141 other followers