Obama To Propose Meaningless Drone Strike Standards

The US Government killed four Americans via drone strikes during the Obama administration. It’s a little kept secret that Obama spreads out pictures of alleged terrorists in the Oval Office and points at the ones he wants to kill via drone. We’re supposed to just trust that the President knows what he’s doing even though we know several hundred innocent civilians and four Americans have died. Today Obama is going to propose new rules for his administration to follow, as though those rules couldn’t be broken. Again, we’re supposed to just trust him. There is no judicial or otherwise independent oversight of the rules Obama is placing on himself. Just trust him.

In the case of drone strikes we’re supposed to just trust Obama because he has all sorts of classified information about the terrorists he’s attacking. His new standards are essentially meaningless because he can argue that all of the terrorists he attacks are a continuing and imminent threat to Americans. After all, the standard is going to be kept by the same person applying and arguing the standard in the first place. The buck stops with Obama, he’s the one who picks which terrorists will be attacked. Obama will ask Obama whether the standard has been met concerning a certain terrorist he wishes to attack. It’s utterly absurd.

Obama is trying to get ahead of this scandal. Americans will be rightfully outraged that four Americans were killed by Obama’s predator drone strikes. The country is generally uncomfortable with such strikes and will love to hear that there are standards being put in place. Obama is of course counting on no one noticing that the standards are irrelevant. There won’t be an independent commission reviewing drone strike proposals. There won’t be someone from the judiciary signing off on a drone strike. It will all come back to Obama and if it doesn’t come back to Obama then it will come back to people within the Obama administration who probably won’t tell the President so he can be shielded from any mistakes or criminal activity.

The problem with drone strikes and Obama is that we’re expected to trust his judgment. This is the same President who went to sleep rather than orchestrate a defense of the Benghazi consulate. Four Americans died, including our ambassador. This is the same President who isn’t told much of anything when scandal hits the agencies he’s running or in the alternative is lying about scandals in his government. This is a President who has used the power of the government to suppress whistleblowers and the press. Yet we’re supposed to trust Obama’s grand standards for drone strikes?

Obama’s speech today is all smoke and mirrors. It’s meant to divert attention away from scandals which are increasing in intensity by the hour. Obama is trying to present himself as someone who wants to get out ahead of these nasty drone strikes, as though he hasn’t used them more in his first term than Bush did in two terms. He’ll present himself as though he’s an outsider, absolutely shocked at the power of drone strikes, their potential for abuse and the precedent they set. Obama has been President for four and a half years, he can spare us the moral indignation at this point. His proposals are meaningless, they have no teeth. Why would they? Obama has lived off these drones for four years in the war on terrorism. He isn’t going to actually give them up now even if he tells the country all about his shiny new standards.

The Problem Isn’t Religion, The Problem Is Islam

The media reported yesterday that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were motivated by their religion in bombing the Boston Marathon. What religion that would be is anyone’s guess if one listened to any number of media outlets yesterday. I choose to believe they were emasculated Wiccan’s, after all they could be any religion. Oh wait, that’s right, they’re Jihadist Muslims. Yet another in a long line of violent Muslims from a false religion that has been hellbent on conversion by the sword from its very founding. We’re not supposed to talk about that though, it might be a “rush to judgment” as Obama warned. Apparently 1300 years of bloodshed is too quick to judge a religion to say nothing of its violent scriptures.

This is perhaps the biggest problem with the country today, at least as it pertains to terrorism. We’re afraid to call a spade a spade. As such we have a whole series of violent events at the hands of radical Muslim terrorists and we pretend like they’re one off events. Obama has treated the Benghazi attacks, the Fort Hood shooting and the Boston Marathon bombing as though they have no connection whatsoever. He treats them like they have even less of a connection to the 9-11 attacks. Yet they’re all connected to Islam.

The country, being led by the media, does the same thing. On Sunday night 60 Minutes ran a piece about what a nice boy Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was, so polite and kind, he was even on the wrestling team. Ever since information started coming out about him we’ve been told he was a nice guy and that everyone who knew him was surprised he bombed the Boston Marathon. Meanwhile we’re told his brother was a controlling jerk. Thus we’re supposed to have sympathy for a 19 year old man who bombed the Boston Marathon, killing three people and injuring 180. Spare me the “he was a nice guy” line.

Yet that’s what the country is eating up right now. The media is pushing sympathy for this terrorist. The media is interested in the individual psychology of the terrorist but is completely uninterested in discussing the root cause: Islam. The last three administrations all made the same mistake, failing to connect terrorism to Islam itself. Bush forever called Islam a religion of peace, Obama and Clinton have pretended like terrorism was our fault and/or individual events which are completely unconnected. Yet they are connected, by Islam.

This is the same media that was very quick to blame Tea Party conservatives last week before we knew who was responsible for the bombings. It appears they can easily connect events when they want to. Yet with Islam the media refuses to connect the dots. Why? Islam is a religion with 1 billion followers worldwide. If 1% of them are radical and thus potential terrorists, we’re talking about 10 million people who are potential terrorists. Odds are the number is well above 10 million. Yet the media and the Obama administration refuse to connect all the dots. All of the Islamic terrorist events are separate, unconnected and unrelated. If they are connected, it’s our fault. Blame never goes to Islam. Though you could bet that had the bombings last week been performed by a member of the Tea Party somehow Sarah Palin would share the blame.

Until our country confronts the real problem in these terrorist attacks you can guarantee we’ll face more of them. The problem is Islam and so long as we continue to allow immigrants from Islamic countries to enter, be it via asylum or student visas, you can guarantee we’ll see more homegrown terrorists like the Tsarnaev’s. So long as we allow illegals to flow through our borders, giving them citizenship for free for their crimes, you can bet that we’ll have more homegrown terrorist events.

Obama Gives Muslims License To Attack

Yesterday Obama took time out of his busy schedule of chit chatting with the gals on The View to give a speech to the UN. His speech was at best very odd. He gave a general defense of freedom of religion and speech. But then he declared “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. One wonders if the future belongs to those who slander Jesus Christ. Oh wait, our government pays for “art” that slanders and defames Christ on a regular basis. I guess the future belongs to Christ haters in Obama’s world. But cross the child molester Mohammed and, well, the future just doesn’t belong to you.

Obama of course makes that statement because he can’t stop himself from apologizing for that ridiculous anti-Mohammed video. Obama continues to pretend that all of the problems we face in Libya are because of that video. Never mind that last week his administration admitted that the attacks in Libya were terrorist attacks. We would also have to ignore the fact that Libya’s President said the video had nothing to do with the attacks. This is pretty consistent with their claim that they warned the US three days before the attacks. When people riot, they usually don’t take three days to plan it. So who does Obama think he’s fooling over at the UN?

In fact, you wonder if Obama believes there is a future for those of us who oppose Islam. To listen to the radical Muslims in the Muslim Brotherhood, who incidentally control Egypt, any opposition or disagreement with Islam is considered slander and blasphemy. So in declaring that there is no future for those who slander Islam, the message Obama is sending to the middle east is that Islam is the future so get out of the way. Is that really the message we want our President conveying to the middle east?

We have an appeasement problem in the White House. We have a President who has basically given the middle east free reign to attack those who “slander” Islam or Mohamed. After all the future doesn’t belong to such people according to Obama. It either doesn’t occur to Obama or he doesn’t care that Muslims will take such a statement as approval of killing non-Muslims and attacking countries like Israel. After all, the future doesn’t belong to such nations as Israel.

You might say that reasonable people won’t interpret Obama’s statement like this. Since when have Muslims in the middle east been reasonable? When talking to the UN, Obama isn’t talking to a group of fairly reasonable auto workers in Ohio. He’s talking to the world and like it or not their interpretation of his words is just as important as the words themselves. By bending over backwards to attack a video that has nothing to do with the middle east protests, which Obama knows has nothing to do with them, Obama has unwittingly given Muslims free reign to go on the rampage against all who slander Islam. How could our President not consider that in the mind of a Muslim any disagreement or criticism is considered blasphemy and therefore slander is beyond comprehension.

Unfortunately no one in the US particularly cares about Obama’s UN speech. The media will largely ignore anything objectionable, they certainly won’t analyze it in any significant way. The conservative media will jump up and down but they’re preaching to the choir. Romney won’t do anything with the speech. He might put out another lame ad that barely attacks the President. Romney’s campaign has done a terrific job of making their candidate look weak though lame ads, so it might be wise to not even bother on this issue. Obama is on his way to victory and no one will care that for the next four years Islam has been given free reign to attack those with “no future.”

Justice Department Won’t Defend Free Speech

Back in July the Justice Department danced around protecting free speech. Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez in July spent two minutes not answering the question “Will you tell us here today, simply, that this administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?” You would think this would be an easy question to answer but apparently not at the Eric Holder Justice Department. This is the same Justice Department that won’t comply with Congressional subpoena’s in the Fast and Furious case and enlists the George Soros Funded group Media Matters to spin the press. So it isn’t like these guys are all about Justice.

The exchange in question happened back in July. It’s only becoming clear now why Perez was reluctant to defend free speech. Hot Air and others opine that the administration backed a UN resolution which was sought by Muslim nations which would criminalize blasphemy. No doubt this plays a role in why Perez didn’t want to back free speech across the board. The Obama administration has spent the last four years trying to appease the Islamic world, the blasphemy resolution was one of the appeasement. That in the United States the Constitution trumps UN resolutions and therefore protects blasphemy against any religion doesn’t really matter to Obama or the left.

Last week the administration spent most of their time attacking an obscure anti-Islam movie on You Tube. This film is supposedly the cause of all the uproar in the middle east, though that has always been a dubious claim. After all, people like Bill Mahr have produced much nastier attacks on Islam (to say nothing of better ascetics) and no one has rioted. Other things are really in play in the middle east, the video is just a made up excuse.

That doesn’t change the administration’s attack on the video. They have roundly attacked it as vile, evil and disgusting. They’ve gone so far as to arrest the alleged producer of the film on bogus parole violations. They have since released him because they have no basis on which to detain the producer. The parole violations were of course nonsense, the administration was really sending a message that anti-Islamic blasphemy will not be tolerated in the United States by this administration. No wonder Thomas Perez danced around defending free speech. He knew the administration had no intention of protecting anti-religious speech.

Keep in mind the only blasphemy this administration will not tolerate is anti-Islamic blasphemy. Americans can continue to attack Jesus Christ and churches of all kind and the administration couldn’t care less and in some cases may join in. We can continue to attack Jews and just about everyone else. Just not Muslims. It isn’t that Obama is a Muslim, he isn’t. What he is though is an appeaser, especially with fellow socialists. Make no mistake, the rioters are Islamic socialists. They have a lot in common with Obama. You don’t actually think the rioters saw that silly video on You Tube do you? They were whipped into a frenzy by Muslim community organizers who are interestingly funded by Soros and other American leftists. They have similar goals, though different end games.

The video isn’t the cause of all these riots, they were caused by 0ther factors be it an organized event by the Muslim Brotherhood or a weapons deal gone bad with the CIA in Libya. The video serves its purpose here in the US, it’s a pretext for Obama’s attack on free speech. If we ever give up our right to free speech, our nation will be lost. We must be free to criticize Islam without government arresting film producers or harassing them. We cannot allow the government to do a perp walk with the producer of an anti-Islamic film like the Obama administration recently did. Their goal is to chill free speech before they try to censor speech via law. This cannot and should not be tolerated by a free people.

UPDATE: The LA Times apparently doesn’t think the movie in question is speech. One wonders how in the world the movie would not qualify as speech under the Constitution. After all, the Constitution protects pornography and all other forms of speech. The idea that it doesn’t protect speech that others find offensive is itself offensive.

Aurora Shooting Shows How We’ve Lost Touch With Reality

It’s been a day since the horrific attack at a movie theater in Colorado. According to the police 12 are dead while 58 others are injured. The killer, James Holmes, seems to have been planning this attack for several weeks if not months. He purchased guns, magazines and ammunition over the past few weeks and months. He booby trapped his home and dyed his hair red. He apparently suggested on some creepy porn web site that he would be in prison soon. In short, Holmes was playing the Joker, one of the bad guys in the Batman series.

It’s very easy to dismiss Holmes as nuts. We Americans love to blame evil on mental problems or political motivations. For over a decade we have refused to call Islam evil, despite hundreds of suicide bombers attacking our troops and allies in the Middle East. Even after the 9-11 attacks, we were only willing to call the hijackers evil rather than the root of their evil: Islam. Likewise whenever there is a mass shooting the media first attacks guns as though they’re somehow responsible for evil and then they start talking about mental disorders. By blaming the Holmes attack on a mental disorder, we’re simply dismissing the fact he is evil. In fact, the media turns Holmes into a victim. After all, who doesn’t feel sorry for people with a mental disorder?

But the fact is that there is evil in the world. There are wicked people who want to do harm to others. Some may be demon possessed, in other cases common grace has been withheld and man is seen at his ultimate worst. The truth is every last one of us is capable of doing exactly what James Holmes did yesterday. We are all totally depraved and but for the grace of God we are restrained from doing such things. But there is evil in the world, great evil such as what Holmes did. When we immediate jump to psychological explanations, we’re dismissing the role of evil and burying our heads in the sand at the same time.

On another note  I am absolutely shocked by the number of children present in the theater for a midnight showing of a nearly three hour PG-13 movie. A six year old was shot and killed, what was she doing there? A 3 month old was grazed by a bullet. What kind of parent takes a 3 month old to a movie, much less a midnight showing? There are reports of numerous 12-14 year olds at this movie. Again, what are such young children doing at a midnight film? We happen to know about these kids because a tragedy occurred but you have to figure this theater in Colorado was relatively representative of other theaters across the country. How many hundreds of six year olds were at a midnight showing of Batman on Thursday? How many babies were taken? How many 12-14 year old children were at such a showing? It must be an enormous number.

We have lost touch with reality when we’re taking children to midnight showings of any movie, much less a PG-13 film that is nearly three hours long. This ties in with our refusal to call evil what it is. As a society we seem to have lost touch with reality. We make excuses for evil or dismiss it with psychological evaluations. Meanwhile parents are taking their kids to the movies at the most absurd time of day. This isn’t a problem for government to solve, it’s a problem that society is going to have to figure out on its own. By the grace of God we will, soon.

Sharia Law Leads To Absurd Afghan Riots And Murders

In Afghanistan a handful of Koran’s were disposed of via a non-malicious burning. The end result? The Muslim barbarian hoards have murdered 4 American troops during six days of riots that have killed around 30 other people. All of this egged on by an absurd and  unnecessary apology from President Obama. His apology, completely unnecessary in a situation as small as a handful of Korans being burned, did little more than tell the Afghan’s that American troops are evil. His apology blew the situation further out of proportion than the Muslim barbarians had already blown it.

It is completely unnecessary for a President to draw attention to this sort of thing with an apology. This is the sort of apology a base commander makes, not the Commander in Chief. But putting that aside, let’s focus on the completely irrational reaction of the Muslims. The lack of charity, the lack of forgiveness by these people ought to disturb us all. Unfortunately it’s becoming quite clear that Muslims have no charity and they have no forgiveness in their hearts.

Canada has been gripped with a trial involving Muslim’s so-called honor killings. There is of course no honor in these murders. But under Muslim sharia law there is honor in them. The Shafia family murdered three teenage girls because they defied their father concerning dress, dating, socializing and using the internet. What in any Christian home would result in a grounding results in murder in a sharia Muslim home.

This is hardly isolated to a random Muslim family in Canada. USA Today reported in 2009 that there were at least six honor killings in the United States. In the UK there are hundreds of honor attacks and they’ve averaged a dozen murders a year over the last decade. Across the globe, thousands of Muslim women are murdered each year because of Sharia law.

With all of this in mind, it ought to disturb us that there is an increasing Sharia law creep within America’s legal system. Judges all over the country have recognized Sharia law and attempted to apply it to Muslims. Oklahoma tried to ban Sharia law from its courts only to have the Federal Appeals Court strike it down. Recently in Pennsylvania a judge threw out charges of assault against a Muslim who attacked an atheist who mocked Mohammed. According to the judge, the Muslim was obligated to attack based on his religion. This is a step away from an American court accepting an honor killing as legitimate.

We are seeing in this country an increasing acceptance of Muslim barbarity. It’s one thing to accept the existence of Muslims in our communities. It’s another thing entirely to accept honor killings, riots over burned books, murders, assaults and other acts of violence in the name of Islam. This is where Obama’s apology is so out of step with what’s going on in the world. By having the Commander in Chief apologize, Obama is in fact signaling his approval of the Afghan riots and Sharia law.

We Christians must be kind to Muslims, how else will we convert them to the Christian faith? But while we must be kind, we must never accept the barbarity of the Muslim faith. We most be vocal in our opposition to so-called honor killings, we must be vocal against Sharia creep within our legal system. Most of all, we must never sit back and tolerate extreme overreactions to nonsense issues like Koran burnings in Afghanistan. Our President ought not be bowing to such extreme overreactions and we must never tolerate such absurdity here at home. Most of all, we have to come to accept that the problem at its root is that the Muslim faith is a faith of violence with a history to back it up.

The Damnable Heresy of Chrislam

There has been a lot of news lately about growing ties between various Christian churches and the Muslim faith. Tomorrow more than a few liberal churches are going to actually read the Quran in a positive light in Church services. It is of course being organized by a group with Soros ties. Earlier in the week evangelical preacher Jack Van Impe left Trinity Broadcast Network (TBN) because they refused to air a show in which he criticized Rick Warren for supporting Chrislam. I’m no fan of Van Impe generally but he’s spot on in opposing growing ties between the Christian faith and the Muslim faith.

It should disturb Christians when the church and church leaders want to increase ties between our faith and any other religious faith. This is true whether we’re talking about Jews, Muslims, Hindus or Earth worshipers. It isn’t a matter of hating those other religions or being cold to those who believe in them. It isn’t even a matter of being opposed to intellectual curiosity about those religions. I couldn’t care less if Christians want to learn about other religions, in fact I wholeheartedly support understanding other religions because it will help us convert their believers. However, what’s going on in these liberal churches and in Warren type churches isn’t intellectual curiosity, it goes well beyond that.

There is a worldwide effort to bring together the Christian, Jewish and Muslim faith into one religion. This is largely the playground of American and western Marxists who really want to see religion destroyed. Separate Christians from their historical faith and eventually the left knows they’ll be able to kill off the whole religion. (Absent divine protection, which of course Marxists don’t take into account) The progressive left has been successful at separating Americans from the founding of this country, it should come as no surprise that these people want to do the same thing to the Christian church.

Like it or not, the Christian and Muslim faiths are not the same. They do not worship the same God and they do not have the same origins. Islam may use portions of the Bible in the Quran but it was created 700 years after Christ. The portions of the Quran not found in the Bible have almost nothing in common with Christian scripture. This is the opposite of the New Testament and the Old Testament, wherein the New directly fulfills what the Old Testament, Jewish scriptures prophesy. That Christians would even pretend that the Islamic faith is similar is absurd.

But these leftists take it one step further. They don’t just claim similarity, they want to bring two opposite religions together to form one faith. Part of the problem is that many of these churches have already moved far left and have rejected the Christian faith. If there are any believers left in their pews, they need to get out before Islam is preached from the pulpit. Christians cannot worship both God and Mammon. We either worship Christ or we don’t. If we worship or hold up other books as equal with God’s Holy Bible, then we don’t worship Christ and cannot call ourselves Christians. These leftist churches essentially no longer worship the God of scripture.

Rick Warren is an influential pastor, even in the conservative evangelical community. It is clear this man is not a believer. He has for quite some time dumbed down the Christian faith in order to get hoards of people into his churches. Sadly his support for Chrislam exposes what he’s really here for. He is leading millions astray by rejecting the Christian faith. He’s dumbed down his churches to the point where the people there do not know proper Christian doctrine from heresy. Now he’s introducing Islam into his church and the people support it without knowing any better. He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

This isn’t a matter of hating Muslims or desiring violence against them. (the accusations of violence have always been absurd and not based on fact) It is a matter of protecting the Christian church from false doctrine. It’s a matter of protecting Christians from being led to a false religion. To be perfectly honest, Islam has very little to do with this issue. We could just as easily be talking about the Jewish faith, holding Sader’s in church or eating Kosher. The issue is protecting the Christian church from doctrinal error and protecting believers from doctrines not found in Christian scriptures. Religious pluralism leads to Hell and we in the church need to protect ourselves and our churches from the damnable heresy of Chrislam.

Terry Jones: The New Hero of Free Speech

Terry Jones, a lunatic preacher who has made himself famous burning or threatening to burn Koran’s, was convicted by a Michigan court of threatening to incite violence in holding a protest outside a mosque. Jones has chosen jail over a $1 bond. I’m left wondering if this is America anymore. I don’t particularly like Jones speech, in my opinion the best way to lead Muslims to Jesus Christ is not by burning a Koran outside of a mosque. But in the United States we have a right to burn Korans, just like we have a right to burn a Bible.

If Jones proposed burning a Bible outside of a fundamentalist church you can rest assured that he would not be arrested for threatening to incite violence. You can rest assured that a jury wouldn’t be asked to determine what his intent is. So why is the Wayne County prosecutors office prosecuting Jones for threatening to burn a Koran? Why are we bending over backward to protect Muslims when we wouldn’t protect any other group? This is yet another example of social justice gone wild. Rather than apply the law equally, the state is protecting a group of people with unconstitutional laws that they’ll never use to protect anyone else.

Jones has a right to hold a protest outside of a mosque, so long as he isn’t on mosque property. Jones has the right to burn a Koran. Even if we don’t like this sort of protest or speech, it is protected by the Constitution. We don’t get to declare that Muslims might get violent and use that as an excuse to thwart free speech. If Muslims get violent over a Koran burning, perhaps there’s something wrong with them. In the United States people are free to burn whatever they want, including the Bible, flag and Koran. Muslims don’t get to dictate our law based on their violent tendencies or their threats of violence.

What this decision reflects a creeping of sharia law into the American courtroom. Muslims have demanded and received sharia law applied to them in much of Europe and in Canada. Demands have been made here in the US and a few courts have deferred to sharia law. Mind you sharia law requires women to be covered head to toe, allows for honor killings for women caught talking to men and so on. Is this really the sort of law we want applied here in the US? The Wayne County decision leads us towards sharia law because it places protecting the Koran above free speech.

Terry Jones is the new hero of free speech in America. The outrageous prosecution and conviction must be appealed and it must be overturned. We should not ban speech based on the violent tendencies or whining demands of Muslims or any other group. We must not sacrifice American values such as free speech to appease Muslims.

Radical British Muslim School Beats Kids, Teaches Hindu’s Drink Cow Urine

A British television channel has secretly recorded the affairs at Darul Uloom Islamic High School a Muslim school run by the prominate Markazi Jamia Mosque. This is supposedly the Eton of Islam, which suggests that it’s very prestigious. Both the Daily Mail and the Telegraph have picked up the story. The school is apparently approved by the British government and I suspect likely receives government funding of some sort. Students at this school are being taught militant Islam, hatred of everyone else and bizarre lies about the practices of non-Muslims.

This school seems to be some sort of Madrassa. Children are forced to memorize the Koran while rocking back and forth. Video shows teachers hitting students in the head as well as kicking. It seems beatings are routine as cameras show beatings on a regular basis. In addition, teachers are on tape encouraging Muslims to live separate from other Britons. According to teachers at this school Hindu’s drink cow piss.

The west has for far to long looked the other way when news of this sort comes out. We love to pretend like this sort of thing only exists in the Middle East. Yet it exists in Great Britain and I guarantee you it exists here in the United States. This is the problem with a multiculturalism that demands that no one assimilate into their surroundings. We’re seeing in Britain today the future here in America.

Here in the US we used to have a melting pot and we were proud of the fact that folks from all over the world could come here and become Americans and join American culture. The left has largely destroyed the melting pot over the last 30-40 years and now no one assimilates into American culture and no one is expected to become American. Instead Americans are expected to learn Spanish.

Britain is a step ahead of their European counterparts in that their former empire allowed for some level of a British melting pot. It was never as large or encompassing as the American melting pot of course but it was significant. Again, liberals attacked the melting pot in Britain using such glamorous feel good terms as tolerance. That tolerance has resulted in mass Muslim immigration without any assimilation into British culture. The end result of that is that Britain now has schools like Darul Uloom Islamic High School where Muslim students are taught to be separate from British culture and in fact are taught to hate British culture.

What do the left-wing British and Americans believe will be the end result will be of having a large group of people who refuse to assimilate into British or American culture? What do they suppose will be the end result when those same people hate the surrounding culture? Do they believe that Muslims will all be sunshine and rainbows if only we leave them alone? That has never been part of the history of Islam. Islam has always been a religion of death and destruction. They convert not with the tongue but by the sword. Having so many Muslims who refuse to assimilate is going to lead only to trouble.

We in the west must wake up to two things. First we need to wake up to the fact that a multiculturalism that refuses to demand assimilation is a failure and recipe for disaster. Second, we must wake up to the fact that Islam isn’t a religion of peace, it’s a religion of hate. Especially so when we’re talking about those who demand Shiria law. Those who believe in Shiria law refuse to assimilate and we in the west need to wake up to the fact that these people want our destruction. We’ve see in in Israel and elsewhere their willingness to kill themselves to advance their cause. How long will it be before we see suicide bombers in London? So long as the good British people and those in power look the other way at places like Darul Uloom Islamic High School I dare say it won’t be more than a generation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 141 other followers