Media Ignores Egyptian Kristallnacht Like Attacks On Christians

May 9, 2011 Leave a comment

Did the Egyptian version of Kristallnacht happen on Saturday? The media has been largely silent about events in Egypt following the revolution that toppled Hosni Mubarak. The military is currently in control, though elections are scheduled for later this year. The Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic socialist groups with ties to Hamas and Iran, has been growing in influence and is expected to win the elections.

With the Muslim Brotherhood’s growing influence, it appears a Kristallnacht like event took place Saturday when Christian churches were burned, 12 people were murdered and over 200 injured. The media reported it briefly on Sunday but is largely silent about it today. The media is largely in bed with the Obama administration and it is no secret that the administration sides with the Islamic socialists and their ‘democracy’ demands. Any event that shines a negative light on this Muslim democracy movement is largely ignored by the media. The Brotherhood’s war plans against Israel are being ignored, their demands for an end to the the decades long peace between Israel and Egypt have also been ignored. The media doesn’t report, so you have no chance to decide whether you agree with the administration’s actions in Egypt or not.

Is the burning of churches, murder of Christians and outright violence against Christians the democracy that Egyptian youth were fighting for? Surely this is not so far as the American and western media is concerned, which is why this subject has been largely ignored. I think that it’s pretty clear that ridding Egypt of Christians and going to war with Israel is the democracy the Muslim Brotherhood was fighting for.

The Brotherhood is an organization with strong ties to terrorists in Hamas and the lunatic Jew haters in Iran. (Iran is currently prosecuting some of its cabinet members for invoking genies, proof positive that they’re lunatics) Their goal is a caliphate, either global in nature or at least an Islamic caliphate in the middle east. The Brotherhood and groups like them in the middle east are largely socialist in governing outlook, which is why George Soros funded groups like Code Pink support them. These groups are anti-capitalist and anti-American, which tickles Code Pink and other Soros groups even more. While the American left disagrees with the Brotherhood on any number of issues (presumably treatment of women and homosexuals) they’re willing to look the other way because they agree on the core principles: Anti-capitalism, anti-American and likely anti-Israel. You could even tie in anti-Christian as well, we know Soros has no love for the Christian faith.

None of these issues are being discussed in the mainstream press. You have to go elsewhere to find actual news about what’s happening in Egypt and the middle east. You’ll likely be stuck tying together the pieces and the connections yourself. What all Americans must ask is why the mainstream press is ignoring the violent Kristallnacht like events in Egypt over the weekend? Why aren’t they looking at this event in any detail? A blurb on page 14 isn’t good enough, the subject deserves a closer look.

I dare say that the mainstream press is ignoring the violence in Egypt for two reasons. First, they are protecting Obama. Second, they don’t particularly care about violence against Christians. The latter point is proven by the media’s near universal blackout on reporting about Muslim violence against Christians throughout Africa, in particular Nigeria and Sudan. The truth is out there about Egypt and it’s pretty clear that the Christian minority is under attack. This is the democracy that the Muslims and Obama administration want so badly in the middle east.

Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

2012 Race Battle Begins: Nicole Sandler Attacks Allen West

April 27, 2011 Leave a comment

According to an NPR host the 2012 election will be the most racist election in history. One thing that can never be forgotten about the extreme left is that as far as they’re concerned conservative equals racist. With a black President as far as the extreme left is concerned any opposition to him is equal to racism. Obama has done little to combat such nonsense. This of course shouldn’t surprise anyone. It’s politically expedient to have his opponents labeled racists and it fits in his leftist outlook.

I expect the accusations of racism to grow over the next 18 months to the point that the left is quite open in accusing all conservatives and all Republicans of being racists. Ultimately I think many Americans will grow tired of hearing others accused of racism when all we do is oppose the President’s policies. At some point independents see through the political nonsense and I suspect they won’t be happy to hear their neighbors or even themselves accused of racism simply because they oppose some of Obama’s policies. I think the far left has the potential to seriously overplay their race cards.

What’s particularly amusing is that there hasn’t been any racism at Tea Parties over the last two years. No one hates Obama because he’s black, no one really cares that he’s black. Of course the left will declare that racism is an underlying factor in opposition to Obama, as though people couldn’t disagree with socialism unless the socialist is black. It’s an absurd accusation and it ignores the fact that most Tea Party types also opposed Bill Clinton.

So while the Tea Party, conservatives and Republicans must be default racists I wonder what liberals are who oppose black conservatives? No doubt they aren’t racists according to the left, I suspect they’re called heroes. Liberals can’t be racist don’t you know. Rep. Allen West is a conservative Republican who also happens to be black. He held a townhall meeting wherein several left-wing hecklers had to be removed, one was arrested. It turns out that the arrested heckler is former Air America talk show host Nicole Sandler. She apparently still works for Premiere Radio Network as a fill-in host, she also has her own online radio program.

If opposition to Obama is racist, which the left has repeatedly declared then what is opposition to black conservatives? The problem with the extreme left is that they tolerate racist statements made against black conservative. Code Pink held a rally wherein Justice Clarence Thomas was attacked, members of the group wanted him “sent back to the field.” Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain was attacked in a left-wing blog as being a “house nigger” and “minstrel act” when he appeared at the CPAC conference in February. For the extreme left, racist attacks against conservative blacks is acceptable yet they claim the moral high ground and use it to attack conservatives who oppose Obama as racist.

Racism is unacceptable in any form. If you oppose Obama because he’s black, you’re an idiot whose opinion should not be taken seriously. If you oppose Obama because you believe in limited government and oppose his expansive government and socialist outlook, you have a legitimate reason to oppose this President. It is an outrage that the left is attempting to marginalize half the country by calling them racists when they have legitimate political reasons to oppose Obama. Especially so when the left is silent about racist attacks on black conservatives.

Filed under Obama Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Middle East On Fire, Obama Slow To Respond

February 25, 2011 Leave a comment

It’s been interesting to watch the Obama administration over the past few weeks. The administration never seems to be on the same page. Hillary Clinton says one thing while Obama does another. It took a week for Obama to say anything remotely supportive of Hosni Mubarak after riots started in Egypt. It turns out that the administration was working with the Muslim Brotherhood and other leftist organizations in secret. When it became clear that Mubarak was going to be removed from office, suddenly Obama was out in public stamping his feet telling the Egyptian President to step down.

Similar things appear to be happening in Libya with Moammar Gadhafi. Gadhafi is a much worse character than Mubarak, especially so considering he bombed a US airline flight in Scotland in the 80′s. President Reagan bombed Libya in 1986 after the Libyans planted bombs in Berlin. After the US took out Saddam, Gadhafi suddenly wanted to be pals with the US. He has been of marginal help in dealing with al Qaeda, who he apparently doesn’t like or more likely is afraid of.

There’s more to Obama’s dealings with Gadhafi though. In the 80′s Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright traveled to Libya with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan to visit Gadhafi. Colonel Gadhafi has been a financial supporter of the Nation of Islam and it’s no secret that there are strong connections between Farrakhan and Obama. Obviously we all know about Obama’s 19 years spent at Wright’s church.

Obama was the first American President to meet with Gadhafi in person. So perhaps they have a personal relationship that makes it difficult for Obama to call on Gadhafi to resign. That said, Obama didn’t even use Gadhafi’s name in his little speech about Libya the other night. He essentially didn’t take any position at all, other than calling on the violence to end. Obama’s Wednesday speech on Libya was incredibly weak and continues his tread of weak American responses to actions abroad. First the President takes forever to formulate a response, then his response is weak. This has unfortunately been Obama’s trend from the beginning.

There are two outcomes in Libya and neither of them are particularly great. Colonel Gadhafi could remain in power. He’s provided the US with a little bit of information about al Qaeda but is otherwise a wicked terrorist who has caused American deaths in the past via terrorism. The other outcome in Libya is that is taken over by Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood. The dominos will have started tipping in Tunisia and Egypt, it will have loved on to Libya. Next up is Algeria and Morocco. The Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of a caliphate will be closer to being achieved.

The two choices aren’t appealing to me or to most people. Unfortunately there isn’t a demand for actual freedom and liberty in Libya, just as there wasn’t in Tunisia or Egypt. These folks aren’t looking to Thomas Jefferson, they’re looking to radical Islamic clerics who just happen to be in bed with socialists and international unions. So seeing Libya fall to the Muslim Brotherhood and assorted Islamic socialists isn’t exactly a good thing. In fact, long term it’s not good at all.

I think President Obama is torn. He’s worked with the Muslim Brotherhood and various left-wing Muslim groups in Egypt. Many of the President’s domestic allies support the Muslim Brotherhood and the unions that are fighting in Egypt and Libya. (think: Code Pink, AFL-CIO etc) On the other hand, the President has close ties with the Nation of Islam, which Gadhafi has supported for many years. Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright has long been a supporter of Gadhafi’s. I think the President is torn, which in part explains his silence for days on end and it certainly explains why Obama couldn’t even use Gadhafi’s name in his speech.

In the end we must recognize that we have both an incredibly weak President who doesn’t like making decisions and a President that is willing to work against the best interests of the country. There is no reasonable case to be made that the Muslim Brotherhood is good for the United States, yet Obama has supported them for two years in their effort to get rid of Mubarak. Mubarak was no saint, but at least he kept things peaceful in the middle east which was in our best interest. Obama would rather see worldwide socialism rule the day and that is surely what was being offered by the Brotherhood and the various unions aiding the Egyptian protests.

Things in the middle east are going to get worse before they get better. The dominos are falling down and we can only hope this doesn’t spread to major oil producing countries like Saudi Arabia. We already know from Facebook that a ‘day of rage’ is being organized on March 11th in Saudi Arabia. It remains to be seen whether or not there will be protesters or if the Saudi’s can crack down on them before the 11th. The middle east is on fire and our President is unfortunately weak and/or on the wrong side.

Filed under foreign policy, islamic socialism, unions Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

Union Protesters Violent, Racist and Dangerous

February 24, 2011 Leave a comment

Back in January the left blamed conservative rhetoric for the Rep. Giffords shooting. It was discussed extensively in this blog, such as these two articles, Link and Link. We were told back then that hateful rhetoric such as Sarah Palin’s map targeting vulnerable Democrat Congressman caused Jared Loughner to fly off the handle and shoot the Congressman. Of course, all of that turned out to be false. Conservative speech was anything but hateful prior to the shooting, the Palin map was the sort of thing both parties produce. It also turns out that Loughner wasn’t a conservative, he was a wicked apolitical person who had been planning Giffords murder since before anyone knew who Sarah Palin was.

Throughout Obama’s first two years in office the left whined about how ‘dangerous’ the Tea Party’s were. The left-wing media desperately searched for ‘racist’ signs, finding few, if any. Charges of racism were not uncommon, even though it could never be proven. Even claims that the n word was shouted at a Congressman couldn’t be proven by the many cameras rolling at the time of the alleged incident. The charges of conservative hate speech have always been false. The lie is put forward by the left in order to discredit the right. If it means putting a plant in a crowd, the left isn’t above that.

So it’s interesting to see what’s going on across the country today as left-wing unions are protesting in various state capitols. For all the unproven charges of dangerous speech and violence at Tea Parties, you would think it is conservatives who are nasty and mean to people. It turns out, it’s left-wing protesters who are nasty, violent and racist. One Democrat even tells  union members that it’s time to go into the streets and ‘get a little bloody.’ That’s certainly not the sort of speech one heard at a Tea Party.

At one union protest a union member attacked a Tea Party woman who was recording the event. He literally tried to cold cock her and ended up knocking her camera around. When did that ever happen to the opposition at a Tea Party?

At another union rally two union members verbally attacked a black man who was part of the Tea Party. One asked if he had any children ‘that you claim.’ Of course, she implies that black men have children that they don’t claim or take care of. This is a clear case of racism that if it happened at a Tea Party the left and left-wing media would howl about for years. If it was the Tea Party, such a statement would represent conservatives every time the media discussed Tea Party rallies. But when it happens at a left-wing union rally, the media ignores it and the left doesn’t care.

Not to be out done, another union member tells a conservative woman that she’s a ‘bad Jew.’ Isn’t that delightful? A little anti-Semitism to go with the racism found at union rallies across the country.

In terms of violent rhetoric and vulgarity, at two different union rallies (keep in mind all these videos come from different union rallies across the country) union members curse out Tea Partiers. At one, a union protester tells a cameraman he’ll do vulgar things to him and called him a faggot. At another rally a union protester curses out a Tea Partier. Once again, I ask did we ever see this sort of behavior at a Tea Party?

The do as I say not as I do left loves to attack conservatives as violent, hateful and racist even though there isn’t a shred of legitimate evidence to back it up. Meanwhile when the left states rallies they spout all sorts of racist statements. Remember the left-wing Code Pink rally where protesters wanted Justice Clarence Thomas sent back to the fields? It goes hand and hand with the racist, violent rhetoric at the union rallies currently taking place across the country.

When the left cries racism and violence at the Tea Party or at the right generally, I think we need to remember what is happening right now at union rallies across the country. Union thugs are attacking people and spouting racist statements while elected Democrats encourage them to get in the streets and ‘get bloody.’ It isn’t the right that’s racist and violent, it is the left. Don’t believe the left-wing lies any longer.

Filed under socialism, unions Tagged with , , , , , , ,

Caliphate Targets Libya, Saudi Arabia Next?

February 23, 2011 Leave a comment

The middle east is on fire. Egypt has already seen its leader taken out of power thanks to the cooperative work of radical Islamic socialists such as the Muslim Brotherhood and assorted leftists such as Code Pink, AFL-CIO and other international unions. Bahrain is seeing massive protests as are Yemen and Libya. All orchestrated online by the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamic socialist groups. The result is that oil has spiked 8% or more in the last two days.

Libya is perhaps the most interesting of the nations that are currently on fire thanks to community organizers within the Muslim Brotherhood. Gaddafi has long been an enemy of the United States. For decades he supported terrorism against the US. He became a kind of, sort of American ally after President Bush took out Saddam Hussein. Gaddafi at the time believed Libya was next and attempted to make peace with Bush. Make no mistake, Gaddafi is a brutal dictator and a wicked, wicked man.

But having said that it’s important to note who the people are that are protesting Gaddafi and more or less starting a civil war in Libya. These people aren’t freedom fighters looking for liberty and an American style Constitution. It’s the Muslim Brotherhood who want to extend a caliphate to Libya. Leaders in the Muslim Brotherhood have called on Libyans to kill Gaddafi. They want to extend Islamic socialism to Libya. I would love to see the Libyans rise up and get rid of Gaddafi but not if it means extending the wicked Islamic caliphate envisioned by the Muslim Brotherhood and their allies in Iran.

President Obama oddly has nothing to say about the attempted revolution in Libya. I find this odd considering that the Libyan problem alone has caused oil to rise to $96 per barrel in just two days. Interestingly Sarah Palin has something to say about the situation. While I appreciate her opposition to Gaddafi and she certainly makes a good case against him, she doesn’t dig deeper than what Gaddafi has done. The people who are rising up against Gaddafi aren’t run of the mill Libyans. In fact, compared to other countries in North Africa the Libyan people are well off. (average salary is around $23,000 per year, double that of the average Egyptian) It’s the Muslim Brotherhood and assorted Islamic socialists that are staging this revolution. These are people that I would think Mrs. Palin would oppose. But she doesn’t scratch beyond the surface to discover these little details.

The Muslim Brotherhood is throwing the world into chaos with the support of radical socialists in American unions and American leftist organizations. The Brotherhood wants a caliphate in the middle east, if not the world. The American leftists (as well as international leftists in Europe and here) want chaos in order to take control here in the US. It’s a perfect marriage considering the power the middle east has over oil prices. Libya produces 2% of the world’s oil but the threat of revolution there has increased oil prices 8% or more.

When oil goes up in price food prices go up as do just about every consumer product. The more things cost, the less we can purchase. When we purchase less, manufacturing jobs are lost. When those jobs are lost, the jobs serving those people are lost. The more unemployed we have, the more ripe for revolution we are. Who wants revolution in the US? The very leftist groups that are supporting the protests and revolutions in Egypt, Libya and the rest of the middle east.

If little Libya can produce such a spike in oil prices, imagine what a big fish like Saudi Arabia might do to oil prices. It just so happens that Islamic socialist groups are trying to organize protests for March 11th in Saudi Arabia. They haven’t had much success yet but considering that nearly all of the Saudi’s neighbors are on fire it’s entirely possible that protests might go forward. The domino effect is taking place here in the middle east, though it’s to soon to tell whether it will cascade to the very strong middle eastern nations. Make no mistake though, the Muslim Brotherhood is the community organizer behind all of these protests and their goal is a middle eastern or global Islamic caliphate. Saudi Arabia is definitely a country they want under their rule.

Those of us who love freedom and liberty, those of us who are of the Christian faith must recognize what is going on in the world today. We must recognize that Islamic radicals and leftist radicals are working together in the middle east because they have common goals. They’re essentially using each other in order to achieve their goals in their home countries. We must fight back against this here in the US. We must be prepared to counter the leftist arguments when they make them here at home. We must advocate liberty and freedom. If we don’t, no one else will.

Filed under foreign policy, islamic socialism, socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

Mubarak Stays; White House and Iran Support Protests

February 11, 2011 Leave a comment

Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is cheering the protests in Egypt. He claims it’s proof that a new Islamic middle east is emerging. So much for the claim that the Egyptian protests are a call for democracy. The term democracy at this point is almost completely meaningless if it’s supported by radical dictators like Ahmadinejad. The fact of the matter is that Iran’s support for the Egyptian protests gives credibility to those of us who believe that the Muslim Brotherhood is seeking to take over and force Islamic socialism on Egypt.

Yesterday Hosni Mubarak refused to step down as President of Egypt. This was more than a little surprising considering those at the White House were fairly adamant that he was going to resign. The Obama administration looks completely inept and completely out of control at this point. Even if they aren’t in firm control of the situation, you would at least think they would have the capability of appearing in control. Instead, they look confused and incompetent.

I’m no fan of Hosni Mubarak. Mubarak is a dictator who runs secret police and has mistreated the people of Egypt for years. In particular he’s mistreated the Christians in Egypt. But the man has kept peace with Israel and he has been an ally to the United States. He has aided the United States in the War on Terror. So it begs the question why the Obama administration is throwing Mubarak under the bus for Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama’s ties to socialists and in particular to American socialist groups supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and other leftists organizations in Egypt certainly explain his position. It’s unfortunate to see that our President has more loyalty to the interests of international socialists than the interests of the United States.

Obama strongly criticized Mubarak’s decision to stay in power. Never mind that Mubarak provides an amount of stability in Egypt, never mind that he has been a strong ally for the United States. Obama wants his pals in the Muslim Brotherhood to run Egypt. He wants to pretend that the protests are a democracy movement when they are anything but a democracy movement. Mubarak’s resignation would have put Egypt into chaos. It’s almost as though Obama is disappointed that there isn’t chaos in Egypt.

When looking at the situation in Egypt do not forget that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad supports the protests. Do not forget that Code Pink supports the protests. Do not forget that the AFL-CIO supports the protests. Do not forget that the Muslim Brotherhood, the more organized of all the protesting groups, supports war with Israel and thus instability in the Middle East. These protests aren’t being driven by brave freedom fighters or by Egypt’s version of John Adams. These protests are being driven by Islamic socialists and those who want war in the middle east. Sadly, Obama is on the side of the socialists and warmongers.

Filed under foreign policy, Obama Tagged with , , , , , , , , , ,

Mubarak To Resign, Military Coup Likely

February 10, 2011 Leave a comment

It appears that Hosni Mubarak will resign later today. It further appears that this is a military coup. One wonders if this is the precious democracy the Islamic socialists in the streets claim to be fighting for. Mubarak’s resignation throws Egypt into chaos and it seriously threatens middle east peace. Especially so with the military taking over. This could lead to more protests, which in turn could very well lead to the Muslim Brotherhood taking over. If radical Muslims take over in Egypt, there will likely be a war with Israel.

While Egypt is thrown into chaos, the New York Times wrote an interesting piece about the young professionals who are part of the protests. It’s interesting because the New York Times note that the protests have united leftists, socialists and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is exactly what I’ve alleged on this blog and it’s what Glenn Beck, Donald Rumsfeld and others have alleged as well. Beck was called a conspiracy theorist and mocked by the liberals at MSNBC as well as many neo-conservatives. I dare say that if the New York Times is making the connection, for different political reasons of course, then there is no point in crying conspiracy theorist.

I found the following quote both amazing and troubling:

“I like the Brotherhood most, and they like me,” said Sally Moore, a 32-year-old psychiatrist, a Coptic Christian and an avowed leftist and feminist of mixed Irish-Egyptian roots. “They always have a hidden agenda, we know, and you never know when power comes how they will behave. But they are very good with organizing, they are calling for a civil state just like everyone else, so let them have a political party just like everyone else — they will not win more than 10 percent, I think.”

Here we have a woman who claims to be a Christian as well as an avowed feminist and leftist supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. She’s a little concerned about what they might do if they’re in power but hey they’re really good at organizing. I don’t doubt that the Muslim Brotherhood is great at community organizing. But I wonder how this Egyptian woman doesn’t understand that as a Christian the Brotherhood will mark her for death. Beyond that, isn’t it interesting that an avowed leftist would like the Brotherhood?

There’s a reason why American leftists support the Muslim Brotherhood. It’s because they have a common belief in socialism. Sure, they disagree about what that socialism might look like (the Communists and Nazi’s had similar disagreements) but that doesn’t mean they don’t have common goals. The battle over which socialism will reign supreme can be battled out later. Right now, their goal is to bring about a form of socialism to Egypt and the world.

Mubarak’s resignation is a feather in the cap of Islamic socialists in Egypt and elsewhere in the middle east. They’ve taken out a strong leader in an important middle eastern country. They’ve taken out the leader of the largest nation at peace with Israel. They’ve taken out one of the biggest allies of the United States. If you think that won’t embolden Islamic socialists who want a caliphate throughout the middle east, you’ve got another thing coming. Egypt is just the beginning with these folks.

It remains to be seen who will ultimately take control in Egypt. Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood, and other Islamic socialist groups, have just as much chance as any of seizing control. These groups had no shot at power prior to their organized chaos, now they have a legitimate shot at controlling Egypt and the biggest army in the middle east. All with the support of President Obama. All with the financial support of George Soros. All with the backing of radical leftist groups like Code Pink. All with the support of American unions like the AFL-CIO.

Oh but of course there’s no connection between the Muslim Brotherhood and American socialists. If you still believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Filed under foreign policy, Politics, socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Code Pink In Bed With Radical Islamic Socialists

February 4, 2011 3 Comments

While I hate to admit that Glenn Beck makes a good argument, I think he does when it comes to the Islamic socialist revolution taking place in Egypt, Tunisia and elsewhere. Code Pink, a radical leftist group here in the United States, is a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood. They have ties to Hamas, in fact they were part of a Hamas flotilla that tried to enter Israel a few years ago. Why would a supposedly peaceful group such as Code Pink want anything to do with a violent Islamic terrorist organization like Hamas? After all, Hamas wants to kill infidels and certainly the ladies at Code Pink would be among those Hamas would kill. Muslim Brotherhood is no different.

Beck points out that the link between these terrorist organizations and groups like Code Pink is socialism. In other words, groups like Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas are pushing Islamic Socialism and thus American and international socialist groups like Code Pink are supportive for that reason. How else can it be explained why Code Pink would support a terrorist organization like Hamas or advertise on Muslim Brotherhood’s web site? Unless Code Pink is simply outright anti-American and anti-Jewish and will support any group that hates American or Jews.

I don’t think Code Pink hates the Jews so long as the Jews are socialists. I think they’ll support any socialist organization and will work towards socialism anywhere in the world. If it means joining hands with terrorists like Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood so be it. If it means joining hands with organizations that would otherwise kill them, so be it. The goal is to promote worldwide socialism. Once everyone is subjected to socialism, then the socialists of the world can fight it out for supremacy.

Keep in mind, Code Pink is being funded in part by George Soros. Beck points out that it is Soros who has funded organizations that engage in shadow governments prior to revolutions. What happened in Egypt in the last few years before the recent protests? The Muslim Brotherhood spent 100 hours together in a ‘shadow legislature’ according to the Wall Street Journal. It seems the Soros formula for revolution is being followed quite well by his paid revolutionaries in Egypt.

So what are we to make of all of this? First, it’s clear that American socialists, who are largely godless atheists, are willing to work with any group of socialists even if they disagree on some issues. Second, it’s clear that once again George Soros is funding a revolution. Americans should keep their eye on this man and his organizations. He is not the philanthropist that he and the media make him out to be. Third, we must intellectually prepare ourselves to counter socialism here in the United States. It’s unlikely that we’ll have a violent socialist revolution here in the US. It’s more likely that socialism will creep in because Americans have become disconnected with the ideals of freedom and liberty that our nation was founded upon.

When Code Pink talks about loving peace and supporting women’s rights, never forget that they are in bed with Islamic Socialist groups like Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood. These groups want to wage war against Israel and they want women relegated to second class status. Code Pink doesn’t stand for no war and they don’t stand for women’s rights. They stand for socialism and in that they’ll stand with anyone who supports socialism. If the Nazi’s weren’t smeared as being right-wing, Code Pink would be on board with Hitler’s National Socialism because he in fact supported socialism. There’s no difference between Hamas and Hitler in this regard. Code Pink and other Soros funded groups are radical and socialist and they’ll do anything to support socialism even if it means becoming allies with murderers.

I’m still left wondering why Obama is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood’s fake democracy movement in Egypt. One wonders if he’s part of the Soros plan.

Filed under Feminism, Politics Tagged with , , , , , ,

DCCC Targets Republicans, Code Pink Protesters Spout Racism & Violence

February 3, 2011 1 Comment

The left-wing media ran wild after the Rep. Giffords shooting accusing conservatives of creating a violent environment. In particular the media blamed Sarah Palin’s PAC for targeting certain Democrat Congressmen, including Giffords. For a week we were told that violent rhetoric and even words with violent definitions were to blame for the Giffords shooting. Of course, only conservatives and Republicans were responsible according to the media narrative. CNN even apologized for a guest using the term ‘cross-hairs’ on a show. So I’m wondering where the media is now that the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee has issued a press release declaring that they’re targeting 19 House Republicans. I thought this sort of violent rhetoric caused the shooting of Congressmen. Oh but I forgot, the left-wing media narrative is that only conservatives and Republicans are violent. Democrats and liberals never are.

Last weekend Code Pink, a radical leftist group funded by George Soros (and also a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood), protested the Koch brothers who apparently were holding some sort of conference in California. For those who aren’t aware the Koch brothers have been libertarian activists for several decades. The left believes they’re the driving force behind the Tea Party movement even though at best the Koch’s have been minimally involved.

At the Code Pink rally demonstrators called for revolution. One demonstrator called for the torture and death of Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife. They also called for the death of Fox News executives. Another demonstrator challenged Glenn Beck to a duel and suggested that she was armed with a concealed weapon during the protest. One protester suggested Justice Thomas get sent ‘back to the fields.’

The left-wing media narrative for the last two years is that the Tea Party is a bunch of fringe lunatics who are violent, racist, bigoted and dangerous. There of course has never been any evidence of any of these accusations but it doesn’t matter so long as the left-wing media is playing along with the narrative. Facts never matter to these people, all that matters is that a statement gets repeated enough for folks to believe it to be true. You’ll recall a Democrat Congressman claimed Tea Party members yelled the n word at him yet there isn’t any video or audio. Repeat the lie enough and folks believe it to be true.

The media of course will ignore the racist and violent protesters at the Code Pink rally because it doesn’t fit into how the media wants leftists to be portrayed. The media wants leftists portrayed as freedom fighters and kind hippies who want to make the world a better place and who love everyone. As such, they’ll ignore the calls for violent revolution (the sort of revolution taking place in Egypt according to one Code Pink protester) and they’ll ignore the blatantly racist statements made against Justice Thomas.

Can you imagine the outrage there would be across party lines if a Tea Partier said that Obama should be sent ‘back to the fields?’ It would be an outrage for someone to say such a thing and you can bet the left-wing media would run with it as proof that the Tea Party is racist. Yet when Code Pink, a Soros funded organization, says the same thing about Justice Thomas the media ignores it. It doesn’t fit into their agenda and I dare say the media will give a pass to anyone who say something racist against a black conservative.

Filed under 2012 election, Obama, Politics Tagged with , , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers