Coordinated Attacks On All Fronts

September 12, 2012 Leave a comment

The fall out from yesterday’s coordinated attacks in Libya and Egypt continues. It appears that Obama didn’t attend any of his national security intel briefings in the last week. The administration has alleged that Obama reads his briefings but if he’s reading them then he isn’t asking any questions nor is he providing direction to his underlings. Today Obama spoke at the State Department and told the folks there that he values foreign service because he once lived abroad. What stunning leadership. Obama has managed to turn foreign service into a statement about himself. Otherwise, Obama doesn’t seem to have much to say about any of this as he jets off to Vegas. Meanwhile protests are breaking out in Kuwait, Sudan and Morocco.

All of these events are coordinated, just like the Arab Spring. They supposedly are spontaneous protests against a film that is critical of Mohammed. The film maker is Sam Bacile. I had earlier said that it was created by Egyptians, it was apparently translated into Arabic by Egyptians. Like the US Embassy in Cairo which apologized to protesters for free speech, University of Pennsylvania professor Anthea Butler doesn’t think much of Bacile’s free speech. She wants Bacile jailed because of the attacks on our embassy’s. We’ve gotten to the point where Ivy League professors want people exercising free speech jailed because barbarians went on a rampage half a world away. Meanwhile MSNBC debates whether Pastor Terry Jones should be jailed for voicing opposition to Islam. What have we come to?

Mitt Romney got in on the act, criticizing the Embassy response to the attack. The left is going bananas over Romney’s statement, which was made before Obama backtracked on his Embassy’s statement. Apparently Romney has “rushed” to comment while the Embassy is given a pass. How absurd. Romney can and should comment on this because he has an alternative foreign policy vision for the nation. While Obama refuses to meet with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Romney says he wouldn’t turn down a meeting. It’s pretty clear that Romney has a different vision of relations in the middle east than Obama does, there is no reason why Romney shouldn’t highlight them. Especially as Obama’s foreign policy unravels before us.

We have a serious problem in this country. We refuse to acknowledge the danger that is Islam. We pretend it’s a religion of peace even while they drag one of our dead ambassador’s through the streets. We pretend like only radicals are dangerous while Muslims protest violently in front of seven of our embassy’s. We make excuses for 9-11 and the attacks on the London Underground. We give them a pass when they violently protest Danish cartoons. Then we actually sit around and debate whether people who publicly oppose Islam should go to jail. Even if we acknowledge that Terry Jones is over the top in his rhetoric or that Sam Bacile’s movie unnecessarily mocks Mohammed, does that mean the government should shut these people down and prohibit their speech?

If this is what it comes down to in America we have lost and the terrorists have won. We have a President who thinks nothing of forcing Christian churches to fund contraception despite their moral opposition which MSNBC cheerleads but they want to jail pastor’s who publicly oppose Islam. We have a President who supported the very people who are responsible for all of these protests in the middle east. Obama’s policies set all of this up. It is Obama who supported the destabilization that has occurred in the middle east thanks to the Arab spring. But it’s Mitt Romney who had best shut his mouth about it. What madness. We need to wake up to what’s going on here because we’re looking at a significant threat to free speech and a significant threat to our security all created by the radical left and Obama.

UPDATE: While Islamic socialists are coordinating attacks on US Embassy’s and liberals are coordinating attacks on American free speech the left-wing press is coordinating questions for Romney, trying to trap him and prevent him from making the points he wants to make.

UPDATE 2: Egypt has reportedly asked its Embassy in Washington (which hasn’t been burned to the ground or attacked) to take all available legal measures against Sam Bacile’s film. Let me make this easy for Egypt: There are no legal measures you may take in the United States against this film. The first amendment protects our right to speak freely, even if it offends you and even if it offends the offensive “prophet” Mohammed. There is nothing you can do to shut down Bacile’s free speech in the US. If our government should ever ban Bacile’s film in any way then all freedom is lost. If we cannot criticize Islam, sharia law will be in effect and freedom will be gone forever. Thankfully our country hasn’t gone down the road of banning speech, at least not yet. So Egypt, take your speech codes back to Cairo.

Filed under foreign policy Tagged with , , , , , ,

Obama’s Foreign Policy Failure On Display in Egypt, Libya

September 12, 2012 6 Comments

The US Ambassador to Libya is dead. Our embassy in Egypt yesterday was attacked by Muslims. Both of these nations were stable when Obama took office. Then he decided to support the Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood. The so-called Arab spring took place and now both of those countries are in chaos. It should come as no surprise that the Muslim hordes have turned on the Americans who supported them. This is all entirely predictable. Thanks to Obama’s absurd foreign policy we have a dead ambassador and two destroyed embassy’s. How’s that Arab spring working out?

Apparently the Islamic socialists are all worked up about an amateur film which is disparaging of Mohammed. The film was made by Egyptian expats, so of course the US is responsible. The US Embassy in Cairo had the following to say about yesterday’s attack:

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.

In other words, the United States apparently rejects the idea of free speech so long as that speech ‘hurts’ those of religious faith. In other words, our government opposes films or other speech produced against Mohammed. We’ll pretend that the same government didn’t have a problem funding “art” which amounts to little more than a crucifix in a jar of urine or other forms of “art” which attacks the Christian faith. No, it’s only Mohammed that cannot be spoken against, lest our Cairo Embassy be outraged. The administration is trying to walk back from the Embassy statement but the damage is already done. The Embassy represents the United States in Egypt, they made the statement, once it’s made it represents our country.

The madness doesn’t stop there. Obama refuses to meet with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Apparently the President’s schedule is just too full to meet with the PM of our only ally in the middle east. While our Embassy in Egypt burns and our ambassador’s are dying, Obama will have a moment for an appearance on David Letterman’s silly show. Now that’s some leadership eh? Obama has allowed things to devolve to the point where he’s openly feuding with Israel while his pals in the Muslim Brotherhood are burning down our Embassy’s and killing our ambassador’s. One wonders if we have any allies in the middle east thanks to Obama.

Obama has aided and abetted the destabilization of North Africa and the middle east. He supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which overthrew a stable pro-US government. He supported the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya, who was marginally pro-US and in the very least stable. Elsewhere he’s been inconsistent, sometimes supporting Arab revolution and other times not supporting it, even when the Muslim Brotherhood is involved. In Iran, he refused to support real democracy demonstrators. In Syria he’s been all over the place. Obama doesn’t have a core foreign policy outlook other than he hates everything the US has ever done in the middle east. Unfortunately that isn’t a very good basis for consistent foreign policy.

Obama’s lack of consistent policy and his lack of a serious core objective is now rearing its ugly face. He’s openly feuding with our only long term ally in the region. The two countries he openly supported in revolution have turned on the United States, destroyed our embassy’s and killed one ambassador. The rest of the region isn’t any better, Obama has no idea what to do in Syria, Afghanistan is an absolute mess and Iran continues to threaten to nuke Israel. But of course, Obama can’t be bothered to meet with the Israeli PM to discuss the matter. Meanwhile the voice of our government in Egypt condemns free speech and supports the Muslims attacking them. Which of course means that Obama has no control over his embassy’s.

Obama’s first term hasn’t just been an economic disaster for the country, it’s been a foreign policy disaster as well. We’re seeing that today. Obviously the economy is going to be the number one issue this November, no one will pretend that this election will be a repeat of 2004. But it is important to note what a disaster Obama has been for this country internationally. It isn’t just his 2009 apology tour, it’s his active policy that is hurting us. We now have two destroyed embassy’s and a dead ambassador all thanks to Obama’s support for Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood. Do we want four more years of this?

UPDATE: The corpse of American ambassador Christopher Stevens is being paraded around by the Muslim mobs. What an absolutely disgrace.

Filed under foreign policy Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Evil Muslim Brotherhood Controls Egypt, Soros & Obama Rejoice

June 25, 2012 3 Comments

The Muslim Brotherhood has elected Mohammed Morsi as President of Egypt. You’ll recall that the Muslim Brotherhood would like to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and was nevertheless supported by the Obama administration during the Arab Spring revolution last year. Just last month Morsi was introduced at a rally by cleric Safwat Higazi who declared that Jerusalem will be Egypt’s new capitol. There’s little doubt that Morsi agrees, the entire Muslim Brotherhood is hellbent on war with Israel. A war in the middle east would be a disaster for the United States, it would create chaos which would ultimately harm us.

Various George Soros funded organizations (Code Pink for example) have supported the Muslim Brotherhood’s revolution. It’s always interesting to see American leftist groups, particularly feminist groups, support the Caliphate efforts in the middle east. One Egyptian beat his pregnant wife to death for not voting the right way, Code Pink doesn’t seem to have anything to say about that. In any event, the goals of Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood are similar. They hate capitalism, they hate Israel and they seek to create chaos and overthrow the existing power structure. As such they’re temporary allies despite the fact that they have fundamental disagreements.

What we are seeing in Egypt is democracy in action. It should remind us why democracy is evil, it’s little more than mob rule. Our founders created a republic. The power is with the people but our ability to create mob rule is significantly diminished. A republic protects individual rights, democracy on the other hand tramples all over them. The left loves to talk about democracy, in their minds if they can get one vote over 50% they can run roughshod over individual rights and implement socialism or in the case of the Muslim Brotherhood their goal is to create an Islamic Egypt and a caliphate. Individual rights mean nothing to these people.

The leftists in Wisconsin spent a year talking about democracy, they spent a year linking their effort to oust Scott Walker to the Arab Spring. These two very different groups have one thing in common which is a desire to control people via democracy. They hate individualism and individual rights. In the upcoming months we’ll see countless examples of Morsi and the Brotherhood denying individual rights all for the “good” of Islam. Of course American leftists like George Soros won’t have anything to say about it. But the Brotherhood murders people, remember that is what democracy looks like.

What’s incredible is that our President supports all of this nonsense. Obama isn’t a Muslim, he’s a leftist. Unfortunately American leftists are very much supportive of the fascist Muslim Brotherhood and the chaos they’re bringing to the middle east. Like with Hitler and Mussolini in the 20′s and 30′s, radical American leftists view what’s happening in the middle east as a dry run for what they want to bring here to the United States. Like with the fascist movement in Europe (which was socialist and generally lauded by American leftists until Hitler attacked the Soviet Union) the middle east won’t provide a dry run. But what it will do is bring major chaos to the world, perhaps war in Israel.

We should oppose the Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover of Egypt. Not because we imagine that modern Israel is more than just another country and not because Israel is an ally. We should oppose the takeover because it brings instability to the middle east, which becomes a threat to us militarily and economically. It brings us closer to a middle east, Muslim caliphate. Don’t forget, the Brotherhood isn’t just in Egypt they’re to be found throughout the Islamic world. Islam is a religion of blood and conquest, a caliphate would be incredibly dangerous for the United States and western life. But don’t expect the current occupant of the White House to care about that. He’s an American self loather who would rather our nation become weak. With the Brotherhood in control in Egypt, America is weaker because we now have less influence in the middle east.

Filed under foreign policy Tagged with , , , , , , ,

How Exactly Is Killing Gaddafi In America’s Best Interest?

October 24, 2011 1 Comment

Gaddafi is dead, apparently we’re supposed to rejoice. There’s no doubt that Gaddafi was a bad guy in the world. He’s responsible for terrorism in the 80′s and he led a generally repressive regime. But he did become a minor ally of the United States after the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Gaddafi provided the US information about a Qaeda, both Bush and Obama acknowledge this. Obama went so far as to meet Gaffafi. Now we have a dead former ally that we inexplicably turned on and his former country now being run by radical Muslims. How is this a victory for Obama or the United States?

Obama met with this guy in 2009. Gaffafi didn’t suddenly change between 2009 and April 2011. He didn’t suddenly take a pro-terrorist position, he didn’t become an al Qaeda member and he did nothing to hurt US interests in the middle east. The only thing that changed in the world is that the Muslim Brotherhood was starting uprisings in Egypt and elsewhere in the Arab world. Obama supports the Brotherhood because of their socialist leanings and because he has Brotherhood sympathizers within his administration.

This appears to be the sole reason for turning on Gaddafi. Obama’s talk about the Pan Am bombing over Scotland in the 80′s is disingenuous. If Obama is so outraged over the bombing why did he meet with Gaddafi and say pleasant things about him in 2009? It simply makes no sense. Obama’s reason for turning on Gaddafi have nothing to do with his former terrorist ties and everything to do with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Long term Obama has seriously hurt America’s position in the world. He’s more or less told regimes throughout the world to not trust us. Don’t become our allies because we’ll come after you anyway. Every tin pot dictator in Africa, the Middle East and Asia is now less likely to become our ally and share information that helps us, whether it’s concerning the War on Terror or any other subject. Why would any nation want to become our ally when we so quickly turn, without justification, against Gaddafi? Obama has seriously hurt our position in the world.

Now that Gaddafi is gone, who is he going to be replaced with? The current leader, Mustafa Abdel Ja­lil, has declared Sharia law in Libya. So we’ve helped replace one repressive violent regime with a regime that, if it strictly follows Sharia law, will be stoning raped women, supporting honor killings and cutting the heads off of infidels. Keep in mind of course that the proponents of Sharia law are the people who took down the World Trade Center. Why exactly are we favoring these people? Worse, al Qaeda is part of the group that revolted against Gaddafi. Again, why is the US supporting these people?

There’s no doubt that Gaddafi was an awful leader. He was brutal, arbitrary and had a terrorist past. But he was a known entity. He became a minor ally, he helped us fight al Qaeda. That doesn’t forgive what he did in the 80′s but it goes a long way. We’ve now helped replace him with radical Muslims who are bringing Sharia law to Libya. We’ve helped the Libyans trade one brutal dictatorship for another. How exactly was this in our best interest?

Obama has yet to adequately explain why getting rid of Gaddafi was in our best interest. Gaddafi’s terrorist past isn’t a valid excuse when he’s been an ally of Bush and Obama’s since 2004. Obama can’t meet with Gaddafi in 2009 and praise him then expect to get taken seriously when he calls him a terrorist in 2011. There was absolutely no justification for aiding the Muslim Brotherhood in getting rid of Gaddafi. We’ve now lost an ally, we’ve lost someone who provided us with intelligence on al Qaeda. We’ve helped replace him with a regime that supports terrorism, against us and Israel. Worse, that regime will keep Libyan’s in bondage just as much, if not more, than Gaddafi. How was this a victory for Obama and the United States?

Filed under Libya, Obama Tagged with , , , , ,

Libyan Rebels Support Jihad, Sharia Law

September 5, 2011 3 Comments

To listen to the media last week you would think the war in Libya was over. Never mind of course that Gadaffi is still alive and his troops continue to fight. Obama didn’t declare mission accomplished but he praised the efforts in Libya. This months after he declared American operations in Libya would be a matter of days and two months after the War Powers Act was violated by the administration.  Even if Gadaffi is removed from office and killed, we have to ask ourselves whether the new regime will be better than the old. Keep in mind, Gadaffi became an ally during the Bush administration when he provided us with information about al Qaeda. Obama even met with him in 2009.

According to the CIA, jihadists are plotting to take over in Libya now that there’s a power vacuum. This shouldn’t come as a surprise considering a draft of a new Libyan constitution declares sharia law. We’ve known from the beginning that radical Islamic socialists in the Muslim Brotherhood, not to mention al Qaeda, participated in the rebel uprising. Keep in mind, this is the side that President Obama decided was so important for us to support. Even after having met with Gadaffi in 2009 and even after having said nice things about him them. Nothing changed on Gadaffi’s side since that meeting, it’s not like he’s engaged in terrorist activity in the last two years. Libya has gone from a state that was obviously borderline but still an ally in the region to a nation that appears set for a jihadist government that enforces sharia law.

The Libyan rebels are rounding up black Libyans and black migrant workers, accusing them of being part of Gadaffi’s forces. The rebels are putting these blacks in concentration camps and it wouldn’t surprise anyone if they were killing some of them. They have no evidence against them, their only reason for arresting them is that they’re black. So not only are the rebels jihadists who want the government to enforce sharia law, they’re racists as well. This is the side Obama made out to be virtuous and freedom loving.

Let’s face facts, President Obama is more allied with the Muslim Brotherhood then he is with American interests. He’s supported the Brotherhood in Egypt even though we had an ally in Mubarak for more than 30 years. He’s supported the Brotherhood in Libya despite Gadaffi becoming an ally and despite an otherwise pleasant and positive meeting with the man in 2009. Obama appears to be shifting on Assad in Syria, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood against him. Syria isn’t really an ally but it’s interesting to watch Obama’s support shift to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Keep in mind, the Muslim Brotherhood’s main goals include destroying Israel, destroying capitalism, creating a socialist caliphate and enforcing sharia law. Interestingly the radical left from which Obama comes from believes in destroying Israel and capitalism and creating socialist nations. It’s why George Soros funded groups supported the Arab Spring and why union leaders and assorted radical leftists have called from an American version. Obama is closely associated with Soros and we all know of his radical leftist ties. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the Muslim Brotherhood gets more support than America’s long term interests in the middle east.

Filed under Libya, Obama Tagged with , , , , , , ,

Radical Leftists Fight For White House Influence

August 17, 2011 1 Comment

Radical Islam in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood has made inroads into the White House. This according to Marxist Tarek Fatah. This is alarming to someone like Fatah because as a Marxist, he is opposed to Islamic socialism because it is essentially National Socialism for Muslims. In the minds of Marxists, National Socialism and Fascism are “right-wing.” In Europe today Fascism is “right-wing” while Democratic Socialism is considered moderate. In the United States all of these positions are on the left-wing wing. The American right-wing is based in freedom and limited government.

That the Marxists are concerned about the growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in the White  House is interesting. There has always been a battle on the left between international socialists who come in the form of Communists and national socialists who come in the form of Fascists. Historically the international socialists got their marching orders from Moscow, today they continue to have the same vision of a worldwide Communist government. The national socialists have never been on board with the international goals of the Communists, even if they agree across the board on everything else. National socialists aren’t interested in the international, they’re interested only in the nation they are part of. We saw that in Germany, Italy, Spain and Argentina. These nations weren’t interested in anything other than their own national interests.

The radical Muslims view Islam as it’s own nation, a caliphate if you will. It doesn’t matter to them that Muslims are in many different countries, they view Islam as a nation. They reject the atheism of Communism, which means they reject international socialism. Their outlook currently is nationalistic, focusing on uniting all Muslims into one nation. I suspect long term their view will move more international, but they must get organized into a caliphate first.

It’s interesting to me that the Marxists are noticing the national socialist goals of the Muslim Brotherhood and are bothered by its influence in the White House. While leftists will generally work together to create chaotic conditions that they can then exploit to gain power, ultimately those with a long term vision realize that the differing factions of socialism will ultimately kill each other for superiority. It’s what happened in Germany for example. In the 1920′s Communists and Nazi’s at times worked together, their members freely moved about the two groups. By the 1930′s the Nazi’s openly opposed the Communists, the battle was for ultimate power in Germany. By the mid 1930′s after Hitler took over, not only were Communists sent to concentration camps, so were all other socialists.

Fatah sees the end game coming, the battle between international socialists and national socialists, probably in the form of an Islamic caliphate. His concern that the influence that the Muslim Brotherhood has in the White House will hurt the position of international socialists. He is absolutely correct, it will. But as Americans we need to ask ourselves why our President is involved in a battle between various groups of radical leftists. Why is the Muslim Brotherhood in the ear of President Obama? If those folks are in the ear of the President, it makes you wonder how many Marxists are whispering in his other ear.

The United States remains the last outpost of freedom in the world. President Obama wants to take our freedom away by nationalizing the auto industry and regulating control of banks from Washington, not to mention Obamacare. It’s never been a secret that Obama is a leftist, but that we have competing groups of radical leftists battling for positioning with the President should disturb us greatly. These groups aren’t interested in individual freedom. They aren’t interested in property rights or free speech. Their idea of democracy is mob rule and violence. We should be greatly concerned that the Muslim Brotherhood has inroads at the White House. We should be even more concerned that Marxists are battling for equal attention. Obama represents oppression and tyranny, not freedom.

Filed under islamic socialism, Obama, Politics, socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Al Gore’s American Spring Call Signals Leftist Protests in 2013

August 5, 2011 Leave a comment

The media and much of the country is focused on the stock market drop yesterday. Over the last two weeks the Dow has dropped 10% and it appears more is on the way today. But tucked hidden away is a story that is far more disturbing than a moderate correction on Wall Street. Former Vice President Al Gore is calling for an “American Spring.” By that he means he wants an overthrown of the American government, much like the overthrown or attempted overthrow of governments throughout the Arab world last spring.

A quick review of what the Arab Spring was. It was a push by the Muslim Brotherhood, funded and aided by western leftists like George Soros, to overthrow governments throughout the Arab world and replace them with Islamic socialist governments. The Brotherhood succeeded in overthrowing the governments in Egypt and Tunisia and continue to fight in Libya and elsewhere.

The key to these Arab revolutions is that they were both Islamic and socialist. Their goal is to replace governments with an Islamic caliphate. Their broader goals, which are shared by western leftists, include the destruction of capitalism, Israel and the United States. This is what makes Al Gore’s comments so disturbing. When he calls for an American Spring, what he’s calling for is the overthrow of the United States as we know it. He wants capitalism destroyed, he wants our country destroyed.

In typical leftist fashion, Gore projects how the left operates on the right. He accuses the Tea Party of being inauthentic and funded by “right-wing billionaires.” Both charges are untrue, but that doesn’t matter. What was inauthentic were the Arab Spring revolutions. They were funded by left-wing billionaire George Soros. They were staged by the Muslim Brotherhood, who had planned the revolutions beginning in 2009. While the media portrayed the Arab Spring revolutions as spontaneous, they were anything but.

So what is Al Gore up to here? Surely Gore doesn’t want to overthrow the Obama administration. What I believe Gore is doing is setting up 2013 for the left. What he’s doing is calling on the left to begin organizing an “American Spring” for the spring of 2013, when a Republican will be President of the United States. What Gore wants to do is create the illusion of a spontaneous reaction to a conservative President, even though the plans were set up long before that President even won the GOP nomination.

Gore wants a left-wing Tea Party to react to a Republican President. Because the left has never been particularly good at spontaneous protests since the 60′s, Gore is calling for the organization of spontaneous protests two years in advance. This is why Gore is attacking the Tea Party, he doesn’t understand how it can be that  protests cannot be organized. The Tea Party was never funded in any serious way by the Koch Brothers or any other billionaire.

Gore and many on the left can’t figure out how that could be possible because the left is incapable of protesting without massive organization. The left has massive unions that are capable of organizing Astroturf protests and they have the George Soros funded Open Society organizations that are capable of organizing massive protests. Organization takes time and Gore and the left cannot figure out how the Tea Party was able to spontaneously arise without organization. As a result, the left assumes there was organization and projects its organization and its inability to be spontaneous on the right.

Everyone is ignoring Al Gore’s statement. We should not. We must be prepared for an American Spring in 2013 where legions of Astroturf liberals descend on the streets of Washington protesting the next Republican President. The plans are in the works. If Al Gore is calling for it, you can bet that Soros and the unions are going to heed his call, if they haven’t decided to organize such protests already. When these protests happen in the spring of 2013, we will know that Gore called for them in 2011 and they will have been organized for the last two years. They will be about as spontaneous as a 100 year old building.

Filed under islamic socialism, socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

“Anti-War” Obama Secretly Bombs Yemen

June 9, 2011 Leave a comment

Our anti-war President is at it again, bombing yet another country. This time it’s Yemen, which is arguably worse than the war in Libya. At least in Libya, President Obama was upfront about what he was doing. In Yemen we’ve been dropping bombs for weeks and perhaps years without any comment from the President. Not even the War Powers Act authorizes this sort of military strike without Congressional knowledge or approval. Yet here is the anti-war President dropping bombs on a supposedly sovereign nation.

Some of the targets in Yemen appear to be legitimate American interests, such as attacking high ranking al Qaeda members. However some are at best questionable. For example the Obama administration has been trying to kill a cleric called Anwar al-Awlaki, who is an American citizen, for over a year. This action by the administration ought to make us at least a little bit uncomfortable. Here we have an American born citizen living in a foreign country who the US is trying to kill rather than capture and try as a criminal. No doubt Anwar al-Awlaki is probably a rotten creature and a criminal, but American citizens ought to be entitled to protections under the Constitution no matter how rotten they are.

The overriding problem with these actions is that Yemen is on the brink of revolution. The Islamic socialists, who we have supported in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya, seek to overthrow the government currently led by President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Our actions, while supposedly in support of President Saleh, have the reverse effect on Yemen’s revolution on the ground. Especially so when Saleh has claimed for the last two years that the airstrikes have been conducted not by the US but by his own military. This has only increased tensions in the country, which would no doubt be made worse if Yemeni citizens knew the Obama administration was really responsible.

So here is the question that must be asked and which will not be answered by Obama. Is the administration actively supporting the revolution on the ground by engaging in these military strikes? Considering that the Obama administration supported the Muslim Brotherhood (who are now operating as the Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt)  and other Islamic socialists in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya, is it out of the question for the Obama administration to support radical Islamic socialists in Yemen? It seems like that would be right up the ally for this administration. So then the question becomes how do these airstrikes play into Obama’s support for radical Islamic socialist revolutionaries?

Obama must know that Yemen has been on the brink of revolution for quite awhile. It’s no secret that President Saleh isn’t well liked and it’s no secret that radical Islam has quite a foothold in Yemen. We also know that President Obama’s foreign policy dictates that Islamic Socialist revolutionaries, supposedly fighting for freedom, democracy and justice, will be supported by the administration. I suspect Obama knows that airstrikes, either coming from the US or supposedly from Yemen’s air force, will undermine Saleh and ultimately support the Islamic socialist revolutionaries that Obama supports. In the meantime, Obama can pick up some foreign policy points if he can kill off members of al Qaeda at the same time.

No matter what Obama’s purposes in Yemen, it is outrageous that the American people do not know about this. This administration, and indeed no administration, has no business conducting secret wars without the knowledge of Congress or the American people. The War on Terror, which Obama denies we are even fighting, may very well take us to places like Yemen. But when the President authorizes air strikes against a nation, even if the attacks are aimed at our enemies in al Qaeda, the Congress and American people must be told. Obama is no anti-war President. He’s very much pro-war. Sadly he’s in favor of secret wars in Yemen and unauthorized wars in Libya.

Filed under foreign policy, Obama Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , ,

Radical Cleric Wants To Sell Americans Like Groceries

June 2, 2011 3 Comments

The media has spent the better part of the week grousing about Sarah Palin and chortling over the so-called Weinergate controversy. Weinergate shows the depths to which our society has fallen, whether Rep. Weiner sent the dirty picture or not. In any event, while the media and the country are paying attention to nonsense, serious events are taking place throughout the world. We remain in an unauthorized war with Libya, the Palestinians continue to demand Jerusalem as the world heads towards a September showdown at the UN and Yemen seems to be coming apart at the seems.

But of course, no one is much interested in what’s going on in the middle east. This is a huge mistake because the events taking place in the middle east today have the potential to dominate the world for the next decade. Islamic socialists are working with radical American leftists and Arab jihadists. They want to destroy Israel, destroy capitalism and destroy western civilization. Make no mistake they are working together because they have similar goals.

A very important and influeential Egyptian cleric, Salafi Shaykh Abi-Ishaq al-Huwayni, has the following to say about Jihad against Israel and the United States:

We are in the era of jihad. The era of jihad has come over us, and jihad in the path of Allah is a pleasure. It is a real pleasure. The companions (of the Prophet) used to compete to (perform jihad). The poverty that we’re in—is it not due to our abandonment of jihad? But if we could conduct one, two, or three jihadist operations every year, many people throughout the earth would become Muslims. And whoever rejected this da’wa, or stood in our way, we would fight against him and take him prisoner, and confiscate his wealth, his children, and his women—all of this means money. Every mujahid who returned from jihad, his pockets would be full. He would return with 3 or 4 slaves, 3 or 4 women, and 3 or 4 children. Multiply each head by 300 dirhams, or 300 dinar, and you have a good amount of profit. If he were to go to the West and work on a commercial deal, he would not make that much money. Whenever things became difficult (financially), he could take the head (i.e. the prisoner) and sell it, and ease his (financial) crisis. He would sell it like groceries. Of those who are–(cuts off)

Charming isn’t it? This guy wants to destroy Israel and then he wants to enslave Americans and sell us like groceries. This guy isn’t kidding around, he’s very serious. But of course the media isn’t much interested in what important and well known Egyptian clerics have to say, even though these clerics urged the revolution in Egypt. You would think the media might be interested in what the people they supported really believe. In this case, we  have a cleric that wants to sell Americans like groceries and kill all the Jews.

You may say that this cleric has nothing to do with the far left in the United States. That would be wrong. The far left admit that they’re working together with the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic radicals in Egypt and elsewhere in the middle east. These people are all interconnected, they have the same basic goals. They want to destroy Israel, western civilization as we know it and capitalism. Their end games are all different, obviously radical Islam and atheist Communism have different end games. But how they get to that end game is the same. Once Israel, the west and capitalism are destroyed, then these groups will turn on each other. Until then they’ll work together.

We need to stop focusing on Palin and Weinergate for a moment to connect the dots in the middle east. Our way of life is at stake. If Israel goes down, not only will these barbarians murder all the Jews they will also be able to set up a super Islamic state. A caliphate if you will. If you don’t think a caliphate will be able to wield significant power, you’ve got another thing coming. These people will likely have access to nuclear weapons and I dare say they won’t be afraid to use them. They’ll get rid of Israel, then they’ll come for us. Whether they kill us all or sell us like groceries remains to be seen.

Filed under islamic socialism Tagged with , , , , , , , ,

Media Ignores Egyptian Kristallnacht Like Attacks On Christians

May 9, 2011 Leave a comment

Did the Egyptian version of Kristallnacht happen on Saturday? The media has been largely silent about events in Egypt following the revolution that toppled Hosni Mubarak. The military is currently in control, though elections are scheduled for later this year. The Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic socialist groups with ties to Hamas and Iran, has been growing in influence and is expected to win the elections.

With the Muslim Brotherhood’s growing influence, it appears a Kristallnacht like event took place Saturday when Christian churches were burned, 12 people were murdered and over 200 injured. The media reported it briefly on Sunday but is largely silent about it today. The media is largely in bed with the Obama administration and it is no secret that the administration sides with the Islamic socialists and their ‘democracy’ demands. Any event that shines a negative light on this Muslim democracy movement is largely ignored by the media. The Brotherhood’s war plans against Israel are being ignored, their demands for an end to the the decades long peace between Israel and Egypt have also been ignored. The media doesn’t report, so you have no chance to decide whether you agree with the administration’s actions in Egypt or not.

Is the burning of churches, murder of Christians and outright violence against Christians the democracy that Egyptian youth were fighting for? Surely this is not so far as the American and western media is concerned, which is why this subject has been largely ignored. I think that it’s pretty clear that ridding Egypt of Christians and going to war with Israel is the democracy the Muslim Brotherhood was fighting for.

The Brotherhood is an organization with strong ties to terrorists in Hamas and the lunatic Jew haters in Iran. (Iran is currently prosecuting some of its cabinet members for invoking genies, proof positive that they’re lunatics) Their goal is a caliphate, either global in nature or at least an Islamic caliphate in the middle east. The Brotherhood and groups like them in the middle east are largely socialist in governing outlook, which is why George Soros funded groups like Code Pink support them. These groups are anti-capitalist and anti-American, which tickles Code Pink and other Soros groups even more. While the American left disagrees with the Brotherhood on any number of issues (presumably treatment of women and homosexuals) they’re willing to look the other way because they agree on the core principles: Anti-capitalism, anti-American and likely anti-Israel. You could even tie in anti-Christian as well, we know Soros has no love for the Christian faith.

None of these issues are being discussed in the mainstream press. You have to go elsewhere to find actual news about what’s happening in Egypt and the middle east. You’ll likely be stuck tying together the pieces and the connections yourself. What all Americans must ask is why the mainstream press is ignoring the violent Kristallnacht like events in Egypt over the weekend? Why aren’t they looking at this event in any detail? A blurb on page 14 isn’t good enough, the subject deserves a closer look.

I dare say that the mainstream press is ignoring the violence in Egypt for two reasons. First, they are protecting Obama. Second, they don’t particularly care about violence against Christians. The latter point is proven by the media’s near universal blackout on reporting about Muslim violence against Christians throughout Africa, in particular Nigeria and Sudan. The truth is out there about Egypt and it’s pretty clear that the Christian minority is under attack. This is the democracy that the Muslims and Obama administration want so badly in the middle east.

Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

← Older posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers