Democrats To Blame For Bank of America Debit Fees

Late last week Bank of America announced that they would be charging $5 per month for debit card users who use their cards to make purchases. This prompted Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin to urge a run on Bank of America. At first glance the action by Bank of America looks outrageous. But you have to do more than scratch the surface of this story. It is in fact Dick Durbin, Democrat Senator, who is partially to thank for the new bank fee.

Last year the Democrats passed a bill that limits the ability of debit card companies to charge swipe fees. Each time you use your debit card or credit card the merchant is charged a swipe fee, for credit cards it’s around 2-3%. Debit cards have always had different fees than credit cards, often a flat fee of around 44 cents per swipe. Durbin’s law reduced swipe fees to 24 cents per swipe, a nearly 50% reduction. That has left issuers of debit cards looking for ways to make up the government ordered lost revenue.

It was entirely predictable that Bank of America would start charging debit card users for using their debit card. The Federal government has more or less shifted the cost of debit cards from merchants to banks with the banks shifting the cost to consumers. In the end consumers are paying more for products and services because of government. Government lowered the cost of swipe fees for merchants but the merchants never passed the savings onto customers. Now consumers are paying for essentially the same swipe fee plus they’re going to pay for the revenue their bank lost because of government action.

It isn’t popular to defend banks but in this case it is absolutely necessary. They’re only charging their debit card customers because government cut their debt card revenue in half. It isn’t cheap to offer debit cards, there is internal infrastructure needed to offer these cards. They’re a convenienceĀ for customers and they do cost something. Bank of America needs to make sure their accounts can be accused by merchants, they need to produce cards and make sure they get to the right people and there are hundreds if not thousands of support staff necessary for a major bank like Bank of America to offer debit cards. If they can’t charge merchants for the convenience of not having to take cash, they’re either going to pass the cost onto their own customers or they’re not going to offer debit cards.

This situation is the classic government debacle when they enter into the marketplace to support a politically connected group over a politically hated group. Government didn’t foresee or didn’t care about the consequences of their actions. Most people in Congress never bothered to consider that banks might pass costs onto their customers when revenue was taken away from them by government order. Those that did consider that possibility likely didn’t care because they hate banks in the first place and they knew they would be able to raise a stink about new fees in order to attack banks. As far as the Dick Durbin’s of Congress were concerned, forcing banks to raise fees on their customers gave them another stick with which to beat down the banks and score cheap political points.

If you’re a Bank of America customer when they charge you a fee for using your debit card remember that it is Democrats in Congress who are responsible. They forced your bank’s hand. If you think that getting out of Bank of America will save you from this fee, think again. Within a year all the banks will have this fee. Other banks may not have the fee now but after the Bank of America firestorm fades into the forgotten past (around next week) they’ll create the fee themselves. It will all be because of Democrats in Congress, you’ll have them to thank for the fees.

Stephen Lerner’s Plan In Practice: UAW Shuts Down Detroit Bank of America

Earlier in the week this blog discussed how Stephen Lerner of SEIU was planning economic terrorism by organizing leftists to target the stock market and major banks. While that story has been dismissed by some as right-wing conspiracy talk, the fact of the matter is that this plan of Lerner’s is already being put into action. These leftists aren’t kidding around. Stephen Lerner isn’t a wide eyed college student thinking big thoughts and dreaming big dreams. He is a seasoned leftist union organizer who has been praised by leftists for his organizing capabilities. He cannot and should not be taken lightly.

Last week in Pennsylvania members of SEIU stormed ESSA Bank’s headquarters and shut it down. They walked in, stamped their feet and shut down the entire bank. Isn’t that what Stephen Lerner was talking about, at least in part, during his talk at Pace University? (Lerner can be heard here, the unedited version is available here) I suspect the ESSA Bank incident may be a little different than what Lerner was discussing at Pace. SEIU is in battle with a local hospital in which ESSA Bank’s CEO is involved. This however can be viewed as a dry run for what Lerner wants to do with the banks. It seems it was very easy to storm the bank and shut it down.

In Detroit UAW members shut down a Bank of America branch. Doesn’t that strike you as a little odd? Why would the UAW hold a massive protest specifically targeting Bank of America? I always thought the UAW was about auto workers and last time I checked there were no auto workers at Bank of America. Nevertheless UAW President Bob King stood out in front of the Bank of America branch in Detroit and claimed that the bank paid no income tax in 2009 even though it made $4.4 billion in profit. Unfortunately his numbers are off. According to the liberal Detroit Free Press, Bank of America didn’t pay income tax in 2009 because they had a net loss. They apparently paid back their $45 billion bail out and between 2000-2009 paid $40 billionĀ  in income taxes.

What the UAW did in Detroit is directly related to Stephen Lerner and SEIU plans. These unions are interconnected. They have the same goals and the same tactics. Lerner and company want to rile Americans up by claiming that there is tons of money out there and the banks are just sitting on it and screwing us out of a comfortable lifestyle. Michael Moore, who is associated with all of these union folks, claimed the country isn’t broke and that banks are sitting on a ‘national resource‘ that being money. His statement goes hand in hand with what Lerner told the leftists at Pace to say about money. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter if what they say is false. Their purpose isn’t to tell the truth, it’s to create conditions for revolution.

The Stephen Lerner story has largely been ignored by the mainstream media. But make no mistake, his plan is anything but ignored by the leftists in this country. It is clear they are following it. They have the battle plan all mapped out, they’re all using the same language and saying essentially the same thing. They’re targeting banks, claiming they don’t pay taxes, claiming they’re holding onto money rather than investing it. They’re claiming the nation isn’t broke, despite $11 trillion in debt. They’re riling up union workers, even though those workers have nothing to do with banks. This is a coordinated effort by the radical left, we must pay attention to it if we are going to save our country.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 150 other followers