Where Is The Leftist Outrage Over Obama’s Prayer Vigil?

The White House is concerned that Obamacare is going to be ruled unconstitutional. They’re currently working to shape the media narrative around the upcoming oral arguments in the case before the Supreme Court. The left is always a step ahead of the Republicans in this regard. While the GOP is fighting a pointless nomination battle, the left is controlling the media on the Obamacare case. The most interesting part of the administration’s attempt to control the narrative is their organization of prayer vigils. I thought prayer in the public square was an outrage and unconstitutional according to the left.

Can you imagine if President Bush had organized a prayer vigil before an important Supreme Court case? The shouts of theocracy from the left would be deafening. As it stands, the entire Bush administration years were spent listening to the left complain about theocracy for no other reason than Bush admitted that he prayed before making important decisions. Yet when the Obama administration organizes a prayer vigil before the Obamacare oral arguments the left remains completely silent.

This is yet another in a long line of hypocritical leftist actions. They cry theocracy when Republicans pray, when Democrats pray they say nothing. When Republican President’s organize a Bible study, it’s called a theocracy by the left. When a Democrat President organizes a prayer vigil, it’s not commented on at all by the left. When a conservative commentator calls a feminist activist a slut it’s an outrage. When a liberal commentator calls a Republican pol, out of office no less, a cunt the left says nothing. In fact the left says nothing whenever a liberal commentator says something sexist or racist but then react with indignant outrage when a conservative does something half as outrageous.

The double standard that liberals hold conservatives to is absolutely absurd. What’s pathetic is that the media goes right along with it. There won’t be any opinion stories masked as news stories quoting well connected liberals on their outrage over Obama’s prayer vigil. There won’t be any atheists whining and complaining on the front page of the New York Times. MSNBC won’t say anything negative about the Obama prayer vigil. But you can imagine their outrage if Bush had done such a thing, you can imagine the outrage if Romney were to pull such a stunt. The left might have an aneurism if Santorum held a prayer vigil.

The double standard is obvious. The media’s reporting of this double standard is non-existent. Obama holding a prayer vigil is good and noble, Bush praying is a sign of democracy. Among the leftist media, this is obvious. They don’t see the double standard because they aren’t objective. Keith Olbermann called Michelle Malkin a mashed up bag of meat with lipstick, the media said nothing because they agree. Countless left-wing commentators have called Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin morons, sluts, bitches and idiots and the media reacts without the slightest bit of outrage. They either agree with such statements or they agree with the outcome such statements are meant to create.

Obama is free to hold a prayer vigil if he so desires. It won’t change the outcome of Obamacare of course. But he’s free to do it. It isn’t a creation of theocracy, it isn’t a bad thing for America. What is a bad thing for America is the blatant double standard displayed by the left-wing media on these matters. We won’t see a single hit piece from the far left attacking public prayer. Don’t take this as a sign that the media has given up such reporting, it will return the second a Republican prays in public. In fact, they’re hitting Santorum for being religious while saying nothing of the White House organizing prayer vigils. The left has yet again exposed their hypocrisy and they’ve once again exposed media bias.

Rick Perry Attacked By Far Left Atheists For Exercising Constitutional Right

Texas Governor Rick Perry is being attacked by leftists because he had the audacity to speak at a Christian prayer event over the weekend. The Anti-Defamation League declared that Perry violated “the spirit” of the Constitution. Meanwhile atheist Barry Lynn declared that Perry must be “confused” as he is “the Governor of Texas not a preacher or prayer leader.” I must say it is the ADL that seeks to violate the spirit of the Constitution and it’s Barry Lynn who is confused. Since when are Governors and other elected officials banned from believing in God and sharing their belief with others? The far left seems to think that Christians elected to office are required to leave their faith the minute they take the oath of office.

Gov. Perry’s speech wasn’t exactly controversial. To the left however it is extremely controversial. Any elected official who shares their faith publicly or encourages others to seek Christ is a reprobate to the leftist secular mindset. The New York Times groused that prayers were given “in Jesus Christ’s name.” Imagine the horror of Christians actually praying in Christ’s name as we are commanded to! The only ones horrified are leftists who hate Jesus Christ and loath and despise elected officials who do anything more than claim to believe in generic god.

Perry’s prayer could have been heard in any relatively conservative church in America. In fact, it could have been the opening paragraph of the prayer at the Dutch Reformed church my family attended on Sunday.  Perry stated:

Lord, you are the source of every good thing. You are our only hope, and we stand before you today in awe of your power and in gratitude for your blessings, and humility for our sins. Father, our heart breaks for America. We see discord at home. We see fear in the marketplace. We see anger in the halls of government, and as a nation we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, who blesses us, and for that we cry out for your forgiveness.

Perry’s prayer is only controversial if you don’t believe in God or you hate Jesus Christ. When it comes to the far left, they hate both. The far left thinks it outrageous that the Governor of Texas or any state would publicly proclaim their faith in Christ. As far as they’re concerned, a sitting Governor must keep his mouth shut when it comes to spiritual matters. In reality, the left only wants sitting Governors to keep their mouths shut so that they aren’t confronted with eternity. In other words, they won’t want to censor elected officials religious speech so that they aren’t bothered by it.

In demanding that elected officials censor themselves when it comes to their faith, the far left damages the Constitution. The Constitution doesn’t prevent public officials from talking about their faith. No where does the Constitution order government officials to censor their religious faith or censor their speech. Quite the contrary, the Constitution protects elected officials right to exercise religion and it protects their right to free speech. It’s the ADL and Barry Lynn who want to see speech and faith censored.

Rick Perry isn’t establishing a state church in Texas. All Perry is doing is exercising his religion, which is protected by the Constitution. Whether we agree with Perry’s faith or not, we should be celebrating the fact that Perry has this right in America. Instead the far left complains and wants Perry to censor himself so that they aren’t uncomfortable. It’s time for elected officials to stop giving in to the narcisstic comfort demands of atheists and far leftists. Whether we agree with Perry or not, we should be commending him for sharing his faith publicly. He is doing it the American way, with protection from the Constitution.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 142 other followers