Panetta Lifts Ban On Ladies Serving On The Battle Front
January 24, 2013 4 Comments
It was certainly an interesting day in Washington yesterday. Hillary testified before Congress on the Benghazi matter. She accepted responsibility for what happened and then proceeded to blame Congress. Of course Congress must be responsible for the administration failing to counterattack and Congress must be responsible for the absurd video blame that took place after the incident. Equally absurd and perhaps a cover for Hillary from her pal Leon Panetta, women are going to be combat troops in the Obama Army. A war on women? You bet! Under Obama weaker women will be lined up as Taliban cannon fodder.
Women don’t belong in the military much less in combat positions. Modern feminism has bred this nonsense of course. The goal has been to turn women into men and men into women thus creating “equality.” The sexes however are not equal. The strongest man is always stronger than the strongest woman. The average man in the military is stronger and more capable in battle than the strongest and most capable woman. Feminism and the left seek to deny the basic truth that God created men and women differently. Those differences go to intellect, strength, personality etc. Women were not created for battle.
Yet on the left this is a sign of great equality. Obama cares enough about women to send them into battle to die for the country. It’s bad enough that women have died in the War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan where they are nothing but an unnecessary nuisance. Now not only can they be a nuisance, they can be a front line nuisance. If you’re the enemy the first thing you’re going to do is figure out where the women are on the front lines. They’ll be the easiest line to break through in the very least. God forbid any of them get captured as POW’s, one can only imagine what sort of horrors these combat ladies would be subjected to.
This nonsense stems from the feminist belief that men and women are equal. It’s one reason why traditional feminists support abortion in such a strident way. They hate that pregnancy and children get in the way of their ability to be like men. Feminism is rooted in self hatred, at least in its original context. (the term feminism has multiple meanings and definitions these days) It is a self hatred of womanhood, of motherhood. As such those things are swept aside in favor of being more like men. Thus careers become more important than raising children. Sex absurdly becomes the center focus of life but consequences thereof are killed off. Now we’re going to have feminists fighting on the front lines in war. The madness only gets more mad.
Panetta may very well be covering for Hillary by announcing ladies in combat yesterday. However his announcement will have a greater effect on the military and society than Hillary’s testimony, which will be largely forgotten by next week. Panetta and the left are fundamentally transforming the military into a grand social experiment. It will result in the unnecessary deaths of countless women should our nation ever go to war again or should the current wars escalate. There are many unanswered questions regarding Panetta’s decision. If we have a large scale war that requires a draft, will women be drafted and if so will they be forced like men to fight on the front lines against their will? In the name of equality the answer can only be yes.
How long until women are as much subject to registering for the draft as men?
That’s a legitimate question. One would think that in the name of “equality” the left will start pushing for that asap.
I doubt that they will here is why I think that they won’t ask for that at least not for a long time, because the US people have not gotten to the point that they are willing to force women in to serving with out there consent. They also oppose the idea of the draft because there base is against serving in the military.
I agree it will be awhile before women are subjected to the draft. Hopefully there won’t be a draft anytime soon.