Obama Gives Muslims License To Attack

Yesterday Obama took time out of his busy schedule of chit chatting with the gals on The View to give a speech to the UN. His speech was at best very odd. He gave a general defense of freedom of religion and speech. But then he declared “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. One wonders if the future belongs to those who slander Jesus Christ. Oh wait, our government pays for “art” that slanders and defames Christ on a regular basis. I guess the future belongs to Christ haters in Obama’s world. But cross the child molester Mohammed and, well, the future just doesn’t belong to you.

Obama of course makes that statement because he can’t stop himself from apologizing for that ridiculous anti-Mohammed video. Obama continues to pretend that all of the problems we face in Libya are because of that video. Never mind that last week his administration admitted that the attacks in Libya were terrorist attacks. We would also have to ignore the fact that Libya’s President said the video had nothing to do with the attacks. This is pretty consistent with their claim that they warned the US three days before the attacks. When people riot, they usually don’t take three days to plan it. So who does Obama think he’s fooling over at the UN?

In fact, you wonder if Obama believes there is a future for those of us who oppose Islam. To listen to the radical Muslims in the Muslim Brotherhood, who incidentally control Egypt, any opposition or disagreement with Islam is considered slander and blasphemy. So in declaring that there is no future for those who slander Islam, the message Obama is sending to the middle east is that Islam is the future so get out of the way. Is that really the message we want our President conveying to the middle east?

We have an appeasement problem in the White House. We have a President who has basically given the middle east free reign to attack those who “slander” Islam or Mohamed. After all the future doesn’t belong to such people according to Obama. It either doesn’t occur to Obama or he doesn’t care that Muslims will take such a statement as approval of killing non-Muslims and attacking countries like Israel. After all, the future doesn’t belong to such nations as Israel.

You might say that reasonable people won’t interpret Obama’s statement like this. Since when have Muslims in the middle east been reasonable? When talking to the UN, Obama isn’t talking to a group of fairly reasonable auto workers in Ohio. He’s talking to the world and like it or not their interpretation of his words is just as important as the words themselves. By bending over backwards to attack a video that has nothing to do with the middle east protests, which Obama knows has nothing to do with them, Obama has unwittingly given Muslims free reign to go on the rampage against all who slander Islam. How could our President not consider that in the mind of a Muslim any disagreement or criticism is considered blasphemy and therefore slander is beyond comprehension.

Unfortunately no one in the US particularly cares about Obama’s UN speech. The media will largely ignore anything objectionable, they certainly won’t analyze it in any significant way. The conservative media will jump up and down but they’re preaching to the choir. Romney won’t do anything with the speech. He might put out another lame ad that barely attacks the President. Romney’s campaign has done a terrific job of making their candidate look weak though lame ads, so it might be wise to not even bother on this issue. Obama is on his way to victory and no one will care that for the next four years Islam has been given free reign to attack those with “no future.”

About these ads

About Steven
I am a Christian saved by grace through faith. I am a conservative, lawyer, husband, father and political junkie.

9 Responses to Obama Gives Muslims License To Attack

  1. J. Palmer says:

    What scares me is that if you replace the word “Christ” with “Allah” in Steven’s 1:04pm comment, it would fit Islamic ideology.

    Yikes.

    • Steven says:

      So apparently religious faith is scary to you. However the Christian faith isn’t one of conversion by the sword, it requires conversion by the tongue. It’s the complete opposite of Islam.

      • J. Palmer says:

        In 1391 there were terrible riots sweeping across southern Spain. People were offered the choice of converting to Chritianity or being
        killed. Some 20,000 converted under those circumstances.

        http://www.pbs.org/inquisition/pdf/ConversosandtheSpanishInquisition.pdf

        Christianity no longer seems to be this kind of religion, but it was, and who is to say it never will be again? Religion has and will make people do some crazy things.

      • Steven says:

        So 600+ years ago Catholics in Spain did evil. No one ever claimed Christians were perfect, especially scripture. But to bring up events of 600 years ago despite centuries of generally peaceful existence and claim that Christians are as violent as Muslims is just absurd. Mohammed taught conversion by the sword and Islam has generally taken this position to heart over the last 1400 years. Christ taught no such thing and Christians have largely converted by the tongue.

  2. LD Jackson says:

    You can usually tell where a person’s priorities are at by observing how they react and what they say, when the pressure is applied. I believe the true colors of President Obama are showing themselves, in spite of everything he can do to hide them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers

%d bloggers like this: