Individual Mandate A “Tax?” Romney Given A Major Issue
June 28, 2012 8 Comments
The Obamacare decision is in with Bush appointee John Roberts siding with the liberals in ruling it constitutional. The mandate it appears will be declared a “tax” and thus it doesn’t fall under the Commerce Clause. It’s the most absurd of rulings, a complete cop out that ignores what the mandate actually is. Even Obama said it isn’t a tax. In calling it a tax, the Court suggests that individuals can simply “opt out” and refuse to pay it. And what, have 100 Fed agents on our doorstep demanding money? Ridiculous. So much for President Bush appointing conservatives to the bench. These Supreme Court appointments matter and Bush completely dropped the ball with Roberts. It would have been even worse had Alito not replaced the pathetic Harriet Miers.
With all of this in mind, expect Obama to gloat. But also expect the Tea Party to rise up in protest, backing Romney with vengeance. Romney’s campaign has been doing pretty good so far, they’ve not run into any major gaffes recently. Expect Romney to get a slight boost in terms of support as Tea Partiers who may be sitting on the sidelines suddenly join the Romney fray. Obamacare is still opposed by over 50% of the country, so Romney clearly has an issue to play with here. This could be the issue that puts him over the top, Obamacare remains unpopular.
Also expect Romney to raise a significant amount of cash. The Tea Party isn’t the only group that hates Obamacare, businesses and Catholics hate it as well. It’s caused premiums to skyrocket and we all know what Obama is trying to do to the Roman Catholic Church concerning contraception. If 5% of Roman Catholics who generally vote Democrat swing to Romney because they don’t like what Obama is doing that could be enough to win the election for Romney. That issue is back in play now.
Romney has been given a golden opportunity to campaign on the repeal of a job destroying, unpopular 2,000+ page healthcare law. He has the opportunity to corral all of the Tea Party into his camp. The ruling in the very least didn’t expand the Commerce Clause, we can at least rest on that. But this is truly the best ruling for Romney if he wants to win because now he has a major issue besides the economy to run on. He needs to campaign on repeal and offer his own, clear, concise market based alternative. If he does that, he can win this election.
This will definitely help Romney. Most people still hate this bill. No Americans want another tax increase.
With this ruling Obama has officially broken his 2008 pledge not to raise taxes on people earning less than $250,000. Long term, this decision helps Romney. It solidifies his base behind him and he’ll be able to lure independents who don’t like Obamacare.
Pingback: Opinions on SC Decision on Obamacare (Mandate is Just a Tax) - Watchwoman on the Wall
I don’t know, relying on Mitt RomenyCare Romney to expend ‘political capital’ repealing ObamaCare (if he is elected) is a dicey proposition.
We have two choices, re-elect Obama and guarantee Obamacare is here to stay or vote for Romney and hope a Republican Congress forces repeal on him. I’ll take my chance with Romney. In the very least Romney has properly argued that Romneycare is a state issue and not something to be implemented in a one size fits all manner nationally. He’s been fairly consistent in that. I don’t love the guy, I don’t trust him. But at this point what choice do we have?
I guess we don’t have much of a choice at this point.
Two things jump out at me about this ruling. First, the health care mandate, penalty, tax, opens a gaping hole in the wall of our freedom and liberty. What will Congress force us to buy next.
Second, the way the mandate was upheld puzzles me. Justice Roberts went out of his way to redefine the mandate, just so he could uphold it. I am still shaking my head, trying to figure this out.
Roberts legislated from the bench. Now all fines are taxes. The question is whether we’re entitled to due process now if we’re fined by the government.